Hunter movement and habitat use affect observation rate of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus)

Context Hunting by humans is the primary tool for population control for many ungulate species across the United States, including white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). Previous research has focused primarily on the effects of hunting on prey behavior, while neglecting the potential effects that the hunter behavior has on the probability of harvest success. Aims Our objectives were to assess hunter behavior (i.e. movement and habitat use) and evaluate how these behaviors influence deer observation rates. Methods During the 2008 and 2009 Oklahoma hunting seasons, we recorded GPS and observation data from 83 individual hunters over 487 total hunts. We examined hunter movement speed, path shape, and the proportion of time hunters spent in different vegetation types, and the average distance from landscape features such as roads, water sources, etc. for each recorded hunt. Key results On average, hunters spent 3.7 h (s.e. = 0.1 h) afield during each recorded hunt, traveled 2085 m (s.e. = 79.0 m), and observed 2.7 deer/outing (s.e. = 0.15 deer). Hunters used areas with 25–50% forested cover and greater topographic roughness, and hunted close to water sources (i.e. ponds) but >50 m from roads. Behavior of hunters influenced the probability of observing deer; observation rates of deer increased as hunters used greater forested cover and as their movement rate increased. Conclusions Our results suggest that hunter movement and habitat use influence the number of deer observed during a hunt. Implications Our findings showed that land managers can leverage understanding hunter behaviors to adjust harvest success to meet various management objectives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wildlife Research
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1071/wr24114
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hunter movement and habitat use affect observation rate of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus)

Dustin H. Ranglack, A. H. Meier, Stephen Demarais, Andrew R. Little et al.
1 citations
Wildlife Research
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
1.72
article

Hunter movement and habitat use affect observation rate of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus)

Dustin H. Ranglack, A. H. Meier, Stephen Demarais, Andrew R. Little, Kenneth L. Gee, Stephen L. Webb
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Context Hunting by humans is the primary tool for population control for many ungulate species across the United States, including white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). Previous research has focused primarily on the effects of hunting on prey behavior, while neglecting the potential effects that the hunter behavior has on the probability of harvest success. Aims Our objectives were to assess hunter behavior (i.e. movement and habitat use) and evaluate how these behaviors influence deer observation rates. Methods During the 2008 and 2009 Oklahoma hunting seasons, we recorded GPS and observation data from 83 individual hunters over 487 total hunts. We examined hunter movement speed, path shape, and the proportion of time hunters spent in different vegetation types, and the average distance from landscape features such as roads, water sources, etc. for each recorded hunt. Key results On average, hunters spent 3.7 h (s.e. = 0.1 h) afield during each recorded hunt, traveled 2085 m (s.e. = 79.0 m), and observed 2.7 deer/outing (s.e. = 0.15 deer). Hunters used areas with 25–50% forested cover and greater topographic roughness, and hunted close to water sources (i.e. ponds) but >50 m from roads. Behavior of hunters influenced the probability of observing deer; observation rates of deer increased as hunters used greater forested cover and as their movement rate increased. Conclusions Our results suggest that hunter movement and habitat use influence the number of deer observed during a hunt. Implications Our findings showed that land managers can leverage understanding hunter behaviors to adjust harvest success to meet various management objectives.

Wildlife ResearchVol. 52(4)
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US), Colorado Parks and Wildlife (US), University of Nebraska at Kearney (US), Life Services (United States) (US), Joint Research Center (BE), Texas A&M University (US), Mississippi State University (US)
Colorado Parks and Wildlife, Noble Research Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.