Budgeting for defense in the United States

Smith wrote instructively about the unaffordability and inadequacy of defense spending in the U.K. and the difficult challenges facing the Strategic Defense Review committee. Some of the challenges facing the U.S. resemble those of the U.K., others are of the same ilk but differ in their intensity, still others are unique. This article describes the current state of budgeting for defense in the U.S., focusing on key changes in the last few decades. Such changes are organized into three categories, (a) the strategic, political, and fiscal context for defense budgeting, (b) the allocation to defense and the distribution within that budget, and (c) core processes in both the Pentagon and in Congress. The article ends with some thoughts about the consequences of those changes, considering the needs of the military to effectively implement strategy and the recommendations of the Congressional Committee on Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution Reform.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Economics of Peace and Security Journal
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15355/epsj.20.1.5
Primary Topic
Defense, Military, and Policy Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Budgeting for defense in the United States

Phillip Candreva
The Economics of Peace and Security Journal
Defense, Military, and Policy Studies
article

Budgeting for defense in the United States

Phillip Candreva
article en

Abstract

Smith wrote instructively about the unaffordability and inadequacy of defense spending in the U.K. and the difficult challenges facing the Strategic Defense Review committee. Some of the challenges facing the U.S. resemble those of the U.K., others are of the same ilk but differ in their intensity, still others are unique. This article describes the current state of budgeting for defense in the U.S., focusing on key changes in the last few decades. Such changes are organized into three categories, (a) the strategic, political, and fiscal context for defense budgeting, (b) the allocation to defense and the distribution within that budget, and (c) core processes in both the Pentagon and in Congress. The article ends with some thoughts about the consequences of those changes, considering the needs of the military to effectively implement strategy and the recommendations of the Congressional Committee on Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution Reform.

The Economics of Peace and Security JournalVol. 20(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Defense, Military, and Policy Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.