The handling of healthcare waste analysis with an interval-valued Fermatean fuzzy-based decision-making technique

Medical waste risks people and the environment because it can be infectious and contain hazardous substances. For patients to receive medical attention and recover in a safe environment, garbage must be disposed of correctly. Improper medical waste disposal poses a severe risk to society, which can accelerate the development of various pandemics and epidemics. In this case, medical waste disposal should be handled appropriately. This study presents an integrated multi-criteria decision-making method based on an interval-valued Fermatean fuzzy set. In interval-valued Fermatean fuzzy set, the set of all closed intervals in the unit interval [ 0 , 1 ] is used, and membership and non-membership interval values are taken, making it possible to cover many more elements. The study used entropy, Step-wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA), and Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS) methods defined with interval-valued Fermatean fuzzy numbers. To calculate the criteria weights, the combined entropy-SWARA method is used to compute the objective and subjective weights, respectively. Furthermore, the WASPAS model is utilized to rank alternatives to healthcare waste disposal techniques. After determining the weights of the experts, the rankings of the criteria and alternatives were determined. This method can guarantee high safety and security for health practitioners and society through effective modeling and ranking of risks associated with medical waste disposal. Five alternatives and eight criteria were determined. The analysis for healthcare waste found that incineration ranked highest among other criteria, followed by electromagnetic wave sterilization, disinfection with chemicals, landfill, and encapsulation. In addition, the work’s findings demonstrated that the integrated approach was efficient and helpful in selecting the best disposal technique in healthcare institutions and healthcare waste service companies for healthcare waste management. The performance was then assessed and validated using a sensitivity analysis. For Sensitivity Analysis, experts can adjust the model’s sensitivity by changing the ϑ values. In addition, the study’s findings and their consequences for lawmakers, businesspeople, technologists, and practitioners are examined. In the future, these stakeholders can concentrate on these deficiencies and provide long-term remedies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Futures
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100581
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The handling of healthcare waste analysis with an interval-valued Fermatean fuzzy-based decision-making technique

Murat Ki̇ri̇şçi̇, Serdar Kuzu, Ali Kablan
4 citations
Sustainable Futures
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
8.43
article

The handling of healthcare waste analysis with an interval-valued Fermatean fuzzy-based decision-making technique

Murat Ki̇ri̇şçi̇, Serdar Kuzu, Ali Kablan
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Medical waste risks people and the environment because it can be infectious and contain hazardous substances. For patients to receive medical attention and recover in a safe environment, garbage must be disposed of correctly. Improper medical waste disposal poses a severe risk to society, which can accelerate the development of various pandemics and epidemics. In this case, medical waste disposal should be handled appropriately. This study presents an integrated multi-criteria decision-making method based on an interval-valued Fermatean fuzzy set. In interval-valued Fermatean fuzzy set, the set of all closed intervals in the unit interval [ 0 , 1 ] is used, and membership and non-membership interval values are taken, making it possible to cover many more elements. The study used entropy, Step-wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA), and Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS) methods defined with interval-valued Fermatean fuzzy numbers. To calculate the criteria weights, the combined entropy-SWARA method is used to compute the objective and subjective weights, respectively. Furthermore, the WASPAS model is utilized to rank alternatives to healthcare waste disposal techniques. After determining the weights of the experts, the rankings of the criteria and alternatives were determined. This method can guarantee high safety and security for health practitioners and society through effective modeling and ranking of risks associated with medical waste disposal. Five alternatives and eight criteria were determined. The analysis for healthcare waste found that incineration ranked highest among other criteria, followed by electromagnetic wave sterilization, disinfection with chemicals, landfill, and encapsulation. In addition, the work’s findings demonstrated that the integrated approach was efficient and helpful in selecting the best disposal technique in healthcare institutions and healthcare waste service companies for healthcare waste management. The performance was then assessed and validated using a sensitivity analysis. For Sensitivity Analysis, experts can adjust the model’s sensitivity by changing the ϑ values. In addition, the study’s findings and their consequences for lawmakers, businesspeople, technologists, and practitioners are examined. In the future, these stakeholders can concentrate on these deficiencies and provide long-term remedies.

Sustainable FuturesVol. 9
Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa (TR), Istanbul University (TR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
8.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.