Reliability of differential time to positivity technique for diagnosing catheter-related bloodstream infections: a retrospective analysis

The differential time to positivity (DTTP) technique is the recommended conservative procedure to diagnose catheter-related bloodstream infection (C-RBSI). However, its reliability and accuracy remain under debate. Therefore, we aimed to compare the DTTP technique feasibility to detect C-RBSI compared to the catheter culture (CC) method. We conducted a 9-month retrospective study including bacteremic episodes in which both DTTP blood cultures (BC) and CC were obtained. We analyzed the diagnostic validity of the DTTP technique for detecting C-RBSI compared to the gold standard (C-RBSI with CC), along with patient clinical data. We included 37 episodes of C-RBSI where both DTTP BC and CC were obtained. C-RBSI was confirmed by both techniques in only 13 episodes (35.1%), whereas in 11 (29.7%) and 13 (35.1%), only DTTP BC or DTTP BC with CC (with a difference between catheter lumen and peripheral BC growth of <2 hours) was positive, respectively. Therefore, the validity values of the DTTP technique for predicting C-RBSI were as follows: sensitivity, 50.0%; specificity, 71.8%; positive predictive value, 54.2%; and negative predictive value, 68.3%. The distribution of microorganisms was similar among the three groups. All patients in whom colonization was not demonstrated by CC (<i>n</i> = 11) had been receiving antibiotics before catheter withdrawal. DTTP is a conservative technique that might help to diagnose C-RBSI mostly in situations where catheter removal cannot be achieved. However, it should be interpreted with caution and never be used to rule out C-RBSI. CC before starting antimicrobial therapy remains the most reliable method to diagnose and confirm an episode of C-RBSI.IMPORTANCEWe try to clarify the reliability of the differential time to positivity technique to predict C-RBSI. It may be interpreted with caution and considering clinical signs, as some C-RBSI can be misdiagnosed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Microbiology Spectrum
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02678-24
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reliability of differential time to positivity technique for diagnosing catheter-related bloodstream infections: a retrospective analysis

Pablo Martín‐Rabadán, María Jesús Pérez-Granda, Marta Díaz-Navarro, Patricia Muñóz et al.
1 citations
Microbiology Spectrum
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
2.52
article

Reliability of differential time to positivity technique for diagnosing catheter-related bloodstream infections: a retrospective analysis

Pablo Martín‐Rabadán, María Jesús Pérez-Granda, Marta Díaz-Navarro, Patricia Muñóz, María Guembe, Álvaro Irigoyen, Andrés Visedo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The differential time to positivity (DTTP) technique is the recommended conservative procedure to diagnose catheter-related bloodstream infection (C-RBSI). However, its reliability and accuracy remain under debate. Therefore, we aimed to compare the DTTP technique feasibility to detect C-RBSI compared to the catheter culture (CC) method. We conducted a 9-month retrospective study including bacteremic episodes in which both DTTP blood cultures (BC) and CC were obtained. We analyzed the diagnostic validity of the DTTP technique for detecting C-RBSI compared to the gold standard (C-RBSI with CC), along with patient clinical data. We included 37 episodes of C-RBSI where both DTTP BC and CC were obtained. C-RBSI was confirmed by both techniques in only 13 episodes (35.1%), whereas in 11 (29.7%) and 13 (35.1%), only DTTP BC or DTTP BC with CC (with a difference between catheter lumen and peripheral BC growth of <2 hours) was positive, respectively. Therefore, the validity values of the DTTP technique for predicting C-RBSI were as follows: sensitivity, 50.0%; specificity, 71.8%; positive predictive value, 54.2%; and negative predictive value, 68.3%. The distribution of microorganisms was similar among the three groups. All patients in whom colonization was not demonstrated by CC (<i>n</i> = 11) had been receiving antibiotics before catheter withdrawal. DTTP is a conservative technique that might help to diagnose C-RBSI mostly in situations where catheter removal cannot be achieved. However, it should be interpreted with caution and never be used to rule out C-RBSI. CC before starting antimicrobial therapy remains the most reliable method to diagnose and confirm an episode of C-RBSI.IMPORTANCEWe try to clarify the reliability of the differential time to positivity technique to predict C-RBSI. It may be interpreted with caution and considering clinical signs, as some C-RBSI can be misdiagnosed.

Microbiology SpectrumVol. 13(6)
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES), Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón (ES), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias (ES)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
2.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.