Butchers and Graziers: Meat, Trade, and Shifting Hierarchies in <i>Persuasion</i> and <i>Emma</i>

In this essay, I address the moment in Persuasion when Mrs. Smith tells Anne Elliot that the late Mrs. William Elliot’s grandfather and father were respectively a “butcher” and a “grazier,” thus revealing for the first time in any of Jane Austen’s novels a specific economic ladder by which the low become high. But why of all trades did Austen choose a butcher and a grazier? How were these trades related? What were their social and ethical implications? How could they make men (and their daughters) rich? The essay engages contemporary newspapers, publications, graphic works, and modern scholarship to reconstruct the eighteenth-century public’s perception of butchers and graziers—their disreputable and sometimes violent dealings, illegal trading, promotion of immoral economy, and generally bad reputation—and then to contextualize such practices in relation to the economic and hierarchical inuendoes of the most detailed episode of domestic butchering and meat procurement in all of Austen’s novels: the “Hartfield pork” scene in Emma.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Modern Philology
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/734149
Primary Topic
Literature: history, themes, analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Butchers and Graziers: Meat, Trade, and Shifting Hierarchies in Persuasion and Emma

Lance Bertelsen
Modern Philology
Literature: history, themes, analysis
article

Butchers and Graziers: Meat, Trade, and Shifting Hierarchies in Persuasion and Emma

Lance Bertelsen
article en

Abstract

In this essay, I address the moment in Persuasion when Mrs. Smith tells Anne Elliot that the late Mrs. William Elliot’s grandfather and father were respectively a “butcher” and a “grazier,” thus revealing for the first time in any of Jane Austen’s novels a specific economic ladder by which the low become high. But why of all trades did Austen choose a butcher and a grazier? How were these trades related? What were their social and ethical implications? How could they make men (and their daughters) rich? The essay engages contemporary newspapers, publications, graphic works, and modern scholarship to reconstruct the eighteenth-century public’s perception of butchers and graziers—their disreputable and sometimes violent dealings, illegal trading, promotion of immoral economy, and generally bad reputation—and then to contextualize such practices in relation to the economic and hierarchical inuendoes of the most detailed episode of domestic butchering and meat procurement in all of Austen’s novels: the “Hartfield pork” scene in Emma.

Modern PhilologyVol. 122(4)
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Literature: history, themes, analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.