Not a start and an end but VOT at two timepoints in the life of a heritage speaker

This paper compares the voice onset times (VOT) of one heritage speaker’s Dutch and English stops at two points in their adult life separated by 30 years. Previous research has shown bilinguals exhibit different outcomes in acquiring and maintaining the phonetics of both their languages with some speakers matching the native baseline in both languages and others displaying transfer/interference from one language to the other (Scontras et al. 2015). Further, adult language use can be plastic with some speakers showing more progressive, others more conservative, and others markedly stable language use over time compared to younger generations when experiencing social pressures (Sankoff 2019). The speaker examined here demonstrates both differences from the homeland phonetics of their two languages as well as change between recordings likely due to the social pressure of continued decreasing first language use (community already post-shift at time of first recording). In 1989, the speaker shows Dutch-influenced English VOTs with prevoicing present on the voiced stops and voiceless stops in the short-lag range. However, by 2018, the English VOTs are more homeland-like with no prevoicing and voiceless stops with more aspiration. Their Dutch stops, conversely, start fairly homeland-like in 1989 with consistent prevoicing on voiced stops and short-lag voiceless stops, but the percentage of prevoiced voiced stop tokens decreases and aspiration increases on voiceless stops in 2018. These results concur with previous studies showing cross-language influence and adult language plasticity while also expanding on previous heritage language research by providing a rare, though not first, longitudinal look at how a heritage speaker’s speech has changed over their lifetime.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bergen Language and Linguistics Studies
Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15845/bells.v15i1.4550
Primary Topic
linguistics and terminology studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Not a start and an end but VOT at two timepoints in the life of a heritage speaker

Rachyl Hietpas
Bergen Language and Linguistics Studies
linguistics and terminology studies
article

Not a start and an end but VOT at two timepoints in the life of a heritage speaker

Rachyl Hietpas
article en

Abstract

This paper compares the voice onset times (VOT) of one heritage speaker’s Dutch and English stops at two points in their adult life separated by 30 years. Previous research has shown bilinguals exhibit different outcomes in acquiring and maintaining the phonetics of both their languages with some speakers matching the native baseline in both languages and others displaying transfer/interference from one language to the other (Scontras et al. 2015). Further, adult language use can be plastic with some speakers showing more progressive, others more conservative, and others markedly stable language use over time compared to younger generations when experiencing social pressures (Sankoff 2019). The speaker examined here demonstrates both differences from the homeland phonetics of their two languages as well as change between recordings likely due to the social pressure of continued decreasing first language use (community already post-shift at time of first recording). In 1989, the speaker shows Dutch-influenced English VOTs with prevoicing present on the voiced stops and voiceless stops in the short-lag range. However, by 2018, the English VOTs are more homeland-like with no prevoicing and voiceless stops with more aspiration. Their Dutch stops, conversely, start fairly homeland-like in 1989 with consistent prevoicing on voiced stops and short-lag voiceless stops, but the percentage of prevoiced voiced stop tokens decreases and aspiration increases on voiceless stops in 2018. These results concur with previous studies showing cross-language influence and adult language plasticity while also expanding on previous heritage language research by providing a rare, though not first, longitudinal look at how a heritage speaker’s speech has changed over their lifetime.

Bergen Language and Linguistics StudiesVol. 15(1)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
linguistics and terminology studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Not a start and an end but VOT at two timepoints in the life of a heritage speaker — Rachyl Hietpas · Bergen Language and Linguistics Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS