Exploring Bullshit in the Field of Medical Informatics: A Critical Perspective

Medical informatics continues to face significant challenges in establishing itself as a fully recognized scientific discipline. This lack of recognition can sometimes foster endeavors that, while appealing to uninformed audiences, may lack substantive scientific merit. This paper examines the concept of "bullshit" within the field, distinguishing between two forms: intentional misrepresentation (F-bullshit) and uncritical proliferation of assertions as truth (C-bullshit). By analyzing two case studies - the implementation of a national electronic health record (EHR) system in Switzerland and the use of patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) - we demonstrate how these types of bullshit sometimes emerge in medical informatics. We argue that a thorough investigation into the epistemological foundations of the discipline is essential for clearly delineating authentic scientific progress from superficial or misleading representations that may only mimic scientific rigor.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in health technology and informatics
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3233/shti250064
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Bullshit in the Field of Medical Informatics: A Critical Perspective

Matthias Bender, Murat Sariyar
Studies in health technology and informatics
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

Exploring Bullshit in the Field of Medical Informatics: A Critical Perspective

Matthias Bender, Murat Sariyar
article en

Abstract

Medical informatics continues to face significant challenges in establishing itself as a fully recognized scientific discipline. This lack of recognition can sometimes foster endeavors that, while appealing to uninformed audiences, may lack substantive scientific merit. This paper examines the concept of "bullshit" within the field, distinguishing between two forms: intentional misrepresentation (F-bullshit) and uncritical proliferation of assertions as truth (C-bullshit). By analyzing two case studies - the implementation of a national electronic health record (EHR) system in Switzerland and the use of patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) - we demonstrate how these types of bullshit sometimes emerge in medical informatics. We argue that a thorough investigation into the epistemological foundations of the discipline is essential for clearly delineating authentic scientific progress from superficial or misleading representations that may only mimic scientific rigor.

Studies in health technology and informaticsVol. 323
Bern University of Applied Sciences (CH)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.