IFRS 17 implementation: market participants' perspective

Purpose The article aims to present the main challenges and characteristics of adopting the International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) 17 within insurance undertakings. Design/methodology/approach We examined a comprehensive analysis of the problems associated with IFRS 17 implementation, as observed by 68 market participants, including experts, practitioners, researchers and tutors. Findings The investigation reveals that the annual cohort, treatment of onerous contracts, the two methods used for the calculation of discount rates and the issues surrounding the premium allocation approach represent the most significant challenges faced in the IFRS 17 adoption. Moreover, some problems lose relevance with time and the type of challenge reported depends on the opinion setter’s profession. Practical implications The findings provide insurance companies valuable insights into the key challenges of implementing the IFRS. Furthermore, research shows how regulatory bodies should adapt their guidance and training to assist insurance companies in IFRS implementation. Originality/value The study’s originality lies in the comprehensive analysis of the challenges associated with implementing IFRS 17 in the insurance industry. By integrating institutional theory as a conceptual lens, this study identified key implementation challenges and also explored how these challenges evolve and vary based on the market participants’ perspectives. This multi-dimensional approach to understanding the dynamics of IFRS implementation provides unique insights that contribute to the existing body of knowledge in accounting research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Central European Management Journal
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/cemj-08-2023-0330
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

IFRS 17 implementation: market participants' perspective

Wojciech Strzelczyk, Karolina Puławska
1 citations
Central European Management Journal
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
3.91
article

IFRS 17 implementation: market participants' perspective

Wojciech Strzelczyk, Karolina Puławska
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose The article aims to present the main challenges and characteristics of adopting the International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) 17 within insurance undertakings. Design/methodology/approach We examined a comprehensive analysis of the problems associated with IFRS 17 implementation, as observed by 68 market participants, including experts, practitioners, researchers and tutors. Findings The investigation reveals that the annual cohort, treatment of onerous contracts, the two methods used for the calculation of discount rates and the issues surrounding the premium allocation approach represent the most significant challenges faced in the IFRS 17 adoption. Moreover, some problems lose relevance with time and the type of challenge reported depends on the opinion setter’s profession. Practical implications The findings provide insurance companies valuable insights into the key challenges of implementing the IFRS. Furthermore, research shows how regulatory bodies should adapt their guidance and training to assist insurance companies in IFRS implementation. Originality/value The study’s originality lies in the comprehensive analysis of the challenges associated with implementing IFRS 17 in the insurance industry. By integrating institutional theory as a conceptual lens, this study identified key implementation challenges and also explored how these challenges evolve and vary based on the market participants’ perspectives. This multi-dimensional approach to understanding the dynamics of IFRS implementation provides unique insights that contribute to the existing body of knowledge in accounting research.

Central European Management JournalVol. 33(3)
Kozminski University (PL), Warsaw Management University (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
3.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.