The Utility of Multitarget Stool DNA Testing in Community-Based Clinical Practice

The rate of colon cancer detection (10/5,827 [0.2%] patients for whom it was ordered and 10/3,119 [0.3%] who completed the test) was lower than expected in a screening cohort. Most patients who completed MT-sDNA testing had a false-positive result for advanced adenomas or CRC (73%). Together, these findings raise questions about the effectiveness of screening based on MT-sDNA testing in an average risk population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003480
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Utility of Multitarget Stool DNA Testing in Community-Based Clinical Practice

Aalpen A. Patel, Brett Van Leer‐Greenberg, Abhinav K. Rao, Don C. Rockey et al.
1 citations
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
1.05
article

The Utility of Multitarget Stool DNA Testing in Community-Based Clinical Practice

Aalpen A. Patel, Brett Van Leer‐Greenberg, Abhinav K. Rao, Don C. Rockey, Levi Diggins, Ibrahim Al-Saadi, Shivam Kalra, Danny Tran
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The rate of colon cancer detection (10/5,827 [0.2%] patients for whom it was ordered and 10/3,119 [0.3%] who completed the test) was lower than expected in a screening cohort. Most patients who completed MT-sDNA testing had a false-positive result for advanced adenomas or CRC (73%). Together, these findings raise questions about the effectiveness of screening based on MT-sDNA testing in an average risk population.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 121(2)
Medical University of South Carolina (US), Trident Technical College (US), Palmetto Hematology Oncology (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.