Generalizability of AI-based image segmentation and centering estimation algorithm: a multi-region, multi-center, and multi-scanner study

We created and validated an open-access AI algorithm (AIc) for assessing image segmentation and patient centering in a multi-body-region, multi-center, and multi-scanner study. Our study included 825 head, chest, and abdomen-pelvis CT from 275 patients (153 females, 128 males; mean age 67 ± 14 years) scanned at five academic and community hospitals. CT images were processed with the AIc to determine vertical and horizontal centering at the skull base (head CT), carina (chest CT), and L2-L3 disc (abdomen CT). We manually measured the vertical and horizontal off-centering. We found strong correlations between AIc and manual estimate of off-centering in both the vertical (head, r = 0.93; chest, r = 0.94; abdomen, and r = 0.95) and horizontal directions (head CT, r = 0.85; chest, r = 0.85; abdomen, r = 0.8) and across age groups (r = 0.70-0.97), gender (r = 0.81-0.96), and multiple scanners from the five sites (r = 0.74-0.99). The AIc area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for centered and off-centered CT exams ranged from 0.72 (head) to 0.99 (chest). Therefore, our study showed that positron-emission tomography/CT (PET/CT) examinations commonly exhibit significant off-centering, particularly with vertical deviations often exceeding 30 mm and horizontal deviations between 10 and 30 mm. In addition, it demonstrated that our AI model can effectively assess both vertical and horizontal off-centering, although it performs better at estimating vertical off-centering.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiation Protection Dosimetry
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncaf018
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Radiation Dose and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.36
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generalizability of AI-based image segmentation and centering estimation algorithm: a multi-region, multi-center, and multi-scanner study

Subba R. Digumarthy, Giridhar Dasegowda, Bernardo C. Bizzo, Roshan Fahimi et al.
1 citations
Radiation Protection Dosimetry
Radiation Dose and Imaging
1.36
article

Generalizability of AI-based image segmentation and centering estimation algorithm: a multi-region, multi-center, and multi-scanner study

Subba R. Digumarthy, Giridhar Dasegowda, Bernardo C. Bizzo, Roshan Fahimi, Lina Karout, Mannudeep K. Kalra, Emiliano Garza-Frias, Parisa Kaviani, Narukulla Dadeepya Krishna, Keith J Dreyer
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We created and validated an open-access AI algorithm (AIc) for assessing image segmentation and patient centering in a multi-body-region, multi-center, and multi-scanner study. Our study included 825 head, chest, and abdomen-pelvis CT from 275 patients (153 females, 128 males; mean age 67 ± 14 years) scanned at five academic and community hospitals. CT images were processed with the AIc to determine vertical and horizontal centering at the skull base (head CT), carina (chest CT), and L2-L3 disc (abdomen CT). We manually measured the vertical and horizontal off-centering. We found strong correlations between AIc and manual estimate of off-centering in both the vertical (head, r = 0.93; chest, r = 0.94; abdomen, and r = 0.95) and horizontal directions (head CT, r = 0.85; chest, r = 0.85; abdomen, r = 0.8) and across age groups (r = 0.70-0.97), gender (r = 0.81-0.96), and multiple scanners from the five sites (r = 0.74-0.99). The AIc area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for centered and off-centered CT exams ranged from 0.72 (head) to 0.99 (chest). Therefore, our study showed that positron-emission tomography/CT (PET/CT) examinations commonly exhibit significant off-centering, particularly with vertical deviations often exceeding 30 mm and horizontal deviations between 10 and 30 mm. In addition, it demonstrated that our AI model can effectively assess both vertical and horizontal off-centering, although it performs better at estimating vertical off-centering.

Radiation Protection DosimetryVol. 201(6)
Harvard University (US), University of Connecticut (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Radiation Dose and Imaging
1.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.