Evaluating Patient-Centered Surgical Care Quality Using Patient-Reported Measures of Shared Decision-Making

Although both CollaboRATE and SDM-Q-9 could distinguish patient-centered care quality, CollaboRATE identified performance differences with higher statistical reliability than the SDM-Q-9. With few responses required per surgeon, implementing CollaboRATE as a surgeon-specific PM is realistic and feasible to distinguish patient-centered SDM practices.

Authors

Bruce L. Hall (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2175-7988)
Andrea L. Pusic (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4352-9409)
Jason B. Liu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7083-5703)
Anoosha Moturu
Clifford Y. Ko (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3186-8673)
Larissa K. Temple

Institutions

Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Harvard University (US)
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
University of Rochester Medical Center (US)
University of California, Davis (US)
American College of Surgeons (US)

Publication Details

Journal: Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Published: 2025-04-08
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/xcs.0000000000001402
Citations: 1
Primary Topic: Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Type: article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact: 2.82

Controls

|||

ALL TIME

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

article

Evaluating Patient-Centered Surgical Care Quality Using Patient-Reported Measures of Shared Decision-Making

Bruce L. Hall, Andrea L. Pusic, Jason B. Liu, Anoosha Moturu et al.

Apr 8, 2025

1 citations

Journal of the American College of Surgeons

Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

2.82

article

Evaluating Patient-Centered Surgical Care Quality Using Patient-Reported Measures of Shared Decision-Making

Bruce L. Hall, Andrea L. Pusic, Jason B. Liu, Anoosha Moturu, Clifford Y. Ko, Larissa K. Temple

April 8, 2025article en

1 citations

Abstract

Although both CollaboRATE and SDM-Q-9 could distinguish patient-centered care quality, CollaboRATE identified performance differences with higher statistical reliability than the SDM-Q-9. With few responses required per surgeon, implementing CollaboRATE as a surgeon-specific PM is realistic and feasible to distinguish patient-centered SDM practices.

Journal of the American College of SurgeonsVol. 241(3)

Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), University of Rochester Medical Center (US), University of California, Davis (US), American College of Surgeons (US)

Peace, Justice and strong institutions

Openalex Percentile: Top 12%

Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

2.82

DOI Source OpenAlex

AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluating Patient-Centered Surgical Care Quality Using Patient-Reported Measures of Shared Decision-Making — Bruce L. Hall, Andrea L. Pusic, et al. · Journal of the American College of Surgeons (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS