Moho Geometry and Its Driving Mechanisms in the Northwest Himalaya: Insights From Shear‐Wave Velocity Contrast Across Moho

ABSTRACT To accurately evaluate seismic risk and comprehend the tectonic activity in the Himalayan region, it is essential to have comprehensive knowledge of the structure of the crust and shear‐wave velocity contrast across Moho (δβ M ). Measurements of δβ M are conducted using seismological data recorded at 26 BBS located in the Himalayan region. To estimate δβ M , a novel technique that utilises P‐to‐s converted wave amplitude data was applied. The values of δβ M range from 0.7 to 1.3 km/s across the area under investigation. The δβ M values beneath the Himalaya region vary from 0.7 to 1.0 km/s, whereas with the presence of sedimentary layers, it jumps up to 1.3 km/s. This indicates that the presence of sediments influences the δβ M values. The Moho depth has been taken from the published results below these stations. The crustal thickness (H) varies in the Himalayan region from 44 to 63 km. In the presence of sediments, H varies from 44 to 54 km below the 5 stations. The scaling relation between δβ M and H is positive, which indicates the thick crust associated with a high δβ M meaning that the presence of a low‐velocity material may be fluid at the lower crust beneath the Himalayan region. It is proposed that the fluid, connected with the weak zone, may have activated pre‐existing faults, leading to the generation of earthquakes. It is suggested that the accumulation of strain in the crust–mantle transition zone, which is rich in fluid, might be sufficient to generate seismicity in the lower crust. The identification of such a velocity contrast could allow tracking of temperature–pressure conditions responsible for the genesis of the crust–mantle boundary and their evolution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geological Journal
Published
2025-04-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/gj.5201
Citations
1
Primary Topic
earthquake and tectonic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Moho Geometry and Its Driving Mechanisms in the Northwest Himalaya: Insights From Shear‐Wave Velocity Contrast Across Moho

Chinmay Haldar, Dilip Kumar Yadav, Prakash Kumar, Narendra Kumar
1 citations
Geological Journal
earthquake and tectonic studies
1.87
article

Moho Geometry and Its Driving Mechanisms in the Northwest Himalaya: Insights From Shear‐Wave Velocity Contrast Across Moho

Chinmay Haldar, Dilip Kumar Yadav, Prakash Kumar, Narendra Kumar
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT To accurately evaluate seismic risk and comprehend the tectonic activity in the Himalayan region, it is essential to have comprehensive knowledge of the structure of the crust and shear‐wave velocity contrast across Moho (δβ M ). Measurements of δβ M are conducted using seismological data recorded at 26 BBS located in the Himalayan region. To estimate δβ M , a novel technique that utilises P‐to‐s converted wave amplitude data was applied. The values of δβ M range from 0.7 to 1.3 km/s across the area under investigation. The δβ M values beneath the Himalaya region vary from 0.7 to 1.0 km/s, whereas with the presence of sedimentary layers, it jumps up to 1.3 km/s. This indicates that the presence of sediments influences the δβ M values. The Moho depth has been taken from the published results below these stations. The crustal thickness (H) varies in the Himalayan region from 44 to 63 km. In the presence of sediments, H varies from 44 to 54 km below the 5 stations. The scaling relation between δβ M and H is positive, which indicates the thick crust associated with a high δβ M meaning that the presence of a low‐velocity material may be fluid at the lower crust beneath the Himalayan region. It is proposed that the fluid, connected with the weak zone, may have activated pre‐existing faults, leading to the generation of earthquakes. It is suggested that the accumulation of strain in the crust–mantle transition zone, which is rich in fluid, might be sufficient to generate seismicity in the lower crust. The identification of such a velocity contrast could allow tracking of temperature–pressure conditions responsible for the genesis of the crust–mantle boundary and their evolution.

Geological JournalVol. 60(12)
Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology (IN), National Geophysical Research Institute (IN), Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
earthquake and tectonic studies
1.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.