A Novel Anthropometry‐Based Model to Estimate Appendicular Muscle Mass in Brazilian Older Women

<b>Background:</b> The assessment of appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM) is central to the diagnosis of sarcopenia (SA). We developed an anthropometric model for estimating ASM and tested its validity to identify SA and associated risk of disability (RSA) in older women. <b>Methods:</b> The equation was developed with 89 women (60-88 years, 72 ± 6 years), with a cross-validation sample of 12 women (60-84 years, 67 ± 5 years). Validity was determined through concordance between actual versus estimated ASMs, correlations between actual/estimated ASM versus peak torque (PT) and total work (TW) during isokinetic knee extension/flexion and handgrip strength, and agreement of patients classified with SA and RSA. <b>Results:</b> The predictive equation was ASM (kg) = 0.177 (body mass, kg)-0.075 (arm circumference, cm) + 0.020 (thigh circumference, cm) + 5.376 (<i>R</i> = 0.905; <i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.819; <i>R</i> <sup>2</sup>ad = 0.809; <i>F</i> = 86.96; <i>p</i> < 0.0001; SEE = 1.35 kg). Agreement between actual and estimated ASMs was confirmed by validation (ICC = 0.81; <i>p</i> < 0.0001) and cross-validation samples (ICC = 0.72, <i>p</i> < 0.035). Regression characteristics in PRESS statistics (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> PRESS = 0.79; SEE-PRESS = 1.61) were compatible with the original model. Percent agreements for the classification of SA and RSA from indices calculated using actual/estimated ASM were 98% (gamma = 0.98, <i>p</i> = 0.015) and 68% (gamma = 0.89, <i>p</i> < 0.0001) in validation and 67% (gamma = 1.0, <i>p</i> = 0.032) and 70% (gamma = 0.84, <i>p</i> < 0.001) in cross-validation samples. Correlations between actual/estimated ASM versus PT (range 0.57-0.76, <i>p</i> < 0.05), TW (range 0.51-0.75, <i>p</i> < 0.05), and handgrip (range 0.67-0.74, <i>p</i> < 0.001) were theoretically consistent, being moderate and similar in both samples. <b>Conclusion:</b> This new anthropometric model has satisfactory prediction qualities and could be applied as a simple and practical method for estimating ASM in Brazilian older women.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Aging Research
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/jare/1053086
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Nutrition and Health in Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.16

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Novel Anthropometry‐Based Model to Estimate Appendicular Muscle Mass in Brazilian Older Women

Nádia Souza Lima da Silva, Paulo Farinatti, Jorge Mota, Lorena Rosa et al.
1 citations
Journal of Aging Research
Nutrition and Health in Aging
1.16
article

A Novel Anthropometry‐Based Model to Estimate Appendicular Muscle Mass in Brazilian Older Women

Nádia Souza Lima da Silva, Paulo Farinatti, Jorge Mota, Lorena Rosa, Carlos Augusto Ribeiro
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> The assessment of appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM) is central to the diagnosis of sarcopenia (SA). We developed an anthropometric model for estimating ASM and tested its validity to identify SA and associated risk of disability (RSA) in older women. <b>Methods:</b> The equation was developed with 89 women (60-88 years, 72 ± 6 years), with a cross-validation sample of 12 women (60-84 years, 67 ± 5 years). Validity was determined through concordance between actual versus estimated ASMs, correlations between actual/estimated ASM versus peak torque (PT) and total work (TW) during isokinetic knee extension/flexion and handgrip strength, and agreement of patients classified with SA and RSA. <b>Results:</b> The predictive equation was ASM (kg) = 0.177 (body mass, kg)-0.075 (arm circumference, cm) + 0.020 (thigh circumference, cm) + 5.376 (<i>R</i> = 0.905; <i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.819; <i>R</i> <sup>2</sup>ad = 0.809; <i>F</i> = 86.96; <i>p</i> < 0.0001; SEE = 1.35 kg). Agreement between actual and estimated ASMs was confirmed by validation (ICC = 0.81; <i>p</i> < 0.0001) and cross-validation samples (ICC = 0.72, <i>p</i> < 0.035). Regression characteristics in PRESS statistics (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> PRESS = 0.79; SEE-PRESS = 1.61) were compatible with the original model. Percent agreements for the classification of SA and RSA from indices calculated using actual/estimated ASM were 98% (gamma = 0.98, <i>p</i> = 0.015) and 68% (gamma = 0.89, <i>p</i> < 0.0001) in validation and 67% (gamma = 1.0, <i>p</i> = 0.032) and 70% (gamma = 0.84, <i>p</i> < 0.001) in cross-validation samples. Correlations between actual/estimated ASM versus PT (range 0.57-0.76, <i>p</i> < 0.05), TW (range 0.51-0.75, <i>p</i> < 0.05), and handgrip (range 0.67-0.74, <i>p</i> < 0.001) were theoretically consistent, being moderate and similar in both samples. <b>Conclusion:</b> This new anthropometric model has satisfactory prediction qualities and could be applied as a simple and practical method for estimating ASM in Brazilian older women.

Journal of Aging ResearchVol. 2025(1)
Universidade do Porto (PT), Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Nutrition and Health in Aging
1.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.