Multicentre prospective risk analysis of a fully automated radiotherapy workflow
The FMEA analysis highlighted that points where people interact with the FAW were considered higher risk than lack of trust in the FAW itself. Major concerns were the ability of people to correctly judge output in case of low generalizability and increasing skill degradation. Consequently, educational programs and interpretative tools are essential prerequisites for widespread clinical application of FAWs.
Authors
- Esther Kneepkens (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5725-1554)
- Tomas Janssen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2807-8670)
- Marie‐Claude Biston (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7837-8307)
- Charlotte L. Brouwer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2349-7369)
- Camilla Palmhøj Nielsen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9199-3463)
- Aude Vaandering (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4992-3917)
- Pietro Pisciotta (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5076-9796)
- Ana María Barragán Montero (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9485-3076)
- M. Fusella (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5361-8387)
- Geert De Kerf
- Livia Marrazzo
- Stephanie Tanadini-Lang
- Joshua Mason
- Koen Snijders
- Geoffroy Herbin
Institutions
- University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
- University of Antwerp (BE)
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (GB)
- University of Groningen (NL)
- University of Southern Denmark (DK)
- University of Zurich (CH)
- Odense University Hospital (DK)
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NL)
- Ion Beam Applications (Belgium) (BE)
- University Hospital of Zurich (CH)
- Iridium Kankernetwerk (BE)
- Policlinico Abano Terme (IT)
- University of Florence (IT)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
- Published
- 2025-04-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2025.100765
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 3.77