Europe’s Defence Industry More Than Two Years after Russia’s Full-scale Invasion

Abstract Russia’s full-scale invasion induced the return of industrial warfare and brought transatlantic defence industrial politics to the spotlight. Before 2022, the European defence industry had been able to muddle through without much structural change despite the long-known challenge posed by US comparative advantage and failed or incomplete consolidation and integration as a response to this challenge. More than two years into the war, the article asks what structural impact Russia’s invasion has had. How have Europeans responded to the sudden increase in arms demand? This contribution discusses the two most prominent theoretical frameworks on European integration before taking stock of defence industrial responses by introducing a typology of responses. The following discussion criticizes the two theoretical frameworks and presents the regulatory security state ( rss ) literature as a more insightful approach to understanding the EU’s impact on European defence production. Lastly, based on findings on the EU’s regulatory power, this article suggests a more productive role for the European Union in the defence of Europe.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Review of International Studies
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/21967415-11030006
Primary Topic
Defense, Military, and Policy Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Europe’s Defence Industry More Than Two Years after Russia’s Full-scale Invasion

Lucas Fernando Hellemeier
European Review of International Studies
Defense, Military, and Policy Studies
article

Europe’s Defence Industry More Than Two Years after Russia’s Full-scale Invasion

Lucas Fernando Hellemeier
article en

Abstract

Abstract Russia’s full-scale invasion induced the return of industrial warfare and brought transatlantic defence industrial politics to the spotlight. Before 2022, the European defence industry had been able to muddle through without much structural change despite the long-known challenge posed by US comparative advantage and failed or incomplete consolidation and integration as a response to this challenge. More than two years into the war, the article asks what structural impact Russia’s invasion has had. How have Europeans responded to the sudden increase in arms demand? This contribution discusses the two most prominent theoretical frameworks on European integration before taking stock of defence industrial responses by introducing a typology of responses. The following discussion criticizes the two theoretical frameworks and presents the regulatory security state ( rss ) literature as a more insightful approach to understanding the EU’s impact on European defence production. Lastly, based on findings on the EU’s regulatory power, this article suggests a more productive role for the European Union in the defence of Europe.

European Review of International StudiesVol. 11(3)
Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Defense, Military, and Policy Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.