Believe It or Not, Disbelief Remains Mysterious

ABSTRACT As a basic doxastic attitude ranking with belief and withholding, disbelief remains a comparatively underexplored concept. According to the standard account of disbelief, to disbelieve that p is to believe that not‐ p . A recently proposed rejection account of disbelief argues that disbelief is a sui generis doxastic attitude, viz., an attitude of rejection. This paper argues against both the standard account and the rejection account. I first illustrate that the standard account would entail implausible corollaries. Subsequently, an argument is given that the rejection account would collapse into the standard account and thus be plagued by similar difficulties. Therefore, disbelief remains a puzzling concept that warrants further investigation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ratio
Published
2025-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rati.12445
Primary Topic
Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Believe It or Not, Disbelief Remains Mysterious

Changsheng Lai
Ratio
Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
article

Believe It or Not, Disbelief Remains Mysterious

Changsheng Lai
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT As a basic doxastic attitude ranking with belief and withholding, disbelief remains a comparatively underexplored concept. According to the standard account of disbelief, to disbelieve that p is to believe that not‐ p . A recently proposed rejection account of disbelief argues that disbelief is a sui generis doxastic attitude, viz., an attitude of rejection. This paper argues against both the standard account and the rejection account. I first illustrate that the standard account would entail implausible corollaries. Subsequently, an argument is given that the rejection account would collapse into the standard account and thus be plagued by similar difficulties. Therefore, disbelief remains a puzzling concept that warrants further investigation.

RatioVol. 38(2)
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
Tongji University, Xiamen University, National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences, National Social Science Fund of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Believe It or Not, Disbelief Remains Mysterious — Changsheng Lai · Ratio (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS