Optimizing weed management in chickpea through planting date and fall-applied residual herbicides

Abstract Chickpea provides significant diversification benefits for semiarid cropping systems. However, the crop’s slow emergence and open canopy growth habit make it a poor competitor against rapidly growing weeds during the early season. In 2022 and 2023, field experiments were conducted at two sites, the Montana State University (MSU) Southern Agricultural Research Center, in Huntley, and the MSU Post Agronomy Farm, in Bozeman, to evaluate broadleaf weed management by integrating planting date and fall-applied,soil-active herbicides to chickpea. Application of dimethenamid at 950 g ai ha −1 + pendimethalin at 1.68 kg ai ha −1 , and carfentrazone + sulfentrazone at 238 g ai ha −1 resulted in better protection of yield against weeds and provided longer residual activity for control of kochia, redroot pigweed, and common mallow by reducing weed density to 10 to 20 plants m −2 compared with 50 to 70 plants m −2 in an untreated check. Pyridate (700 g ai ha −1 ) applied postemergence was required with these treatments to eliminate escaped weeds. Early planting provided an additional biomass reduction compared to late planting due to the crop emergence before or around the same time as the weeds. Planting date had no effect on weed density or grain yield in plots that received dimethenamid + pendimethalin and carfentrazone + sulfentrazone, suggesting that these herbicides can extend the planting date window. These herbicide programs and early planting can be integrated with other weed management tactics for additional weed management options in chickpea.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Weed Technology
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2025.30
Primary Topic
Genetic and Environmental Crop Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing weed management in chickpea through planting date and fall-applied residual herbicides

Zach Miller, Clint W. Beiermann, Fabián D. Menalled, Kent McVay et al.
Weed Technology
Genetic and Environmental Crop Studies
article

Optimizing weed management in chickpea through planting date and fall-applied residual herbicides

Zach Miller, Clint W. Beiermann, Fabián D. Menalled, Kent McVay, Qasim A. Khan, Lovreet S. Shergill, Akamjot Brar
article en

Abstract

Abstract Chickpea provides significant diversification benefits for semiarid cropping systems. However, the crop’s slow emergence and open canopy growth habit make it a poor competitor against rapidly growing weeds during the early season. In 2022 and 2023, field experiments were conducted at two sites, the Montana State University (MSU) Southern Agricultural Research Center, in Huntley, and the MSU Post Agronomy Farm, in Bozeman, to evaluate broadleaf weed management by integrating planting date and fall-applied,soil-active herbicides to chickpea. Application of dimethenamid at 950 g ai ha −1 + pendimethalin at 1.68 kg ai ha −1 , and carfentrazone + sulfentrazone at 238 g ai ha −1 resulted in better protection of yield against weeds and provided longer residual activity for control of kochia, redroot pigweed, and common mallow by reducing weed density to 10 to 20 plants m −2 compared with 50 to 70 plants m −2 in an untreated check. Pyridate (700 g ai ha −1 ) applied postemergence was required with these treatments to eliminate escaped weeds. Early planting provided an additional biomass reduction compared to late planting due to the crop emergence before or around the same time as the weeds. Planting date had no effect on weed density or grain yield in plots that received dimethenamid + pendimethalin and carfentrazone + sulfentrazone, suggesting that these herbicides can extend the planting date window. These herbicide programs and early planting can be integrated with other weed management tactics for additional weed management options in chickpea.

Weed TechnologyVol. 39
Dakota State University (US), University of Wyoming (US), Montana State University (US), Wyoming Department of Education (US), Agricultural Research Center (EG), North Dakota State University (US), Colorado State University (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Montana Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Genetic and Environmental Crop Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.