The minimal important change of the gambling symptom assessment scale among individuals experiencing gambling problems who underwent self-help internet interventions

The Gambling Symptom Assessment Scale (G-SAS) is one of the most common treatment outcome measures to assess gambling symptom severity. For clinicians and patients to interpret whether the observed changes in G-SAS scores are meaningful, we need to determine the minimal important change (MIC)–the smallest change in score that patients perceive as important. To estimate the MIC of G-SAS, we analyzed data from 281 participants in two randomized controlled trials of Internet interventions for problem gambling. Participants completed the G-SAS both at baseline and 1 week later and rated their perceived change in gambling symptoms. We estimated the MIC using four approaches based on mean change scores, receiver operating characteristic curves, predictive modeling, and adjusted predictive modeling. When asked the anchor question about symptom changes 1 week after baseline, 52% of participants reported improvement. The MIC estimates ranged from 2.1 to 7.0 points across different approaches. Based on the predictive MIC (3.8, 95% CI 3.2 to 4.4) and adjusted predictive MIC (3.8, 95% CI 2.6 to 4.8), which are expected to be more unbiased than the others, we recommend a four-point reduction as the MIC of the G-SAS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Gambling Studies
Published
2025-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2025.2481839
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Gambling Behavior and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.92

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The minimal important change of the gambling symptom assessment scale among individuals experiencing gambling problems who underwent self-help internet interventions

Berend Terluin, Yasushi Tsujimoto, Yoshitake Takebayashi, Kengo Yokomitsu et al.
3 citations
International Gambling Studies
Gambling Behavior and Treatments
6.92
article

The minimal important change of the gambling symptom assessment scale among individuals experiencing gambling problems who underwent self-help internet interventions

Berend Terluin, Yasushi Tsujimoto, Yoshitake Takebayashi, Kengo Yokomitsu, Ryuhei So, Toshi A. Furukawa
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The Gambling Symptom Assessment Scale (G-SAS) is one of the most common treatment outcome measures to assess gambling symptom severity. For clinicians and patients to interpret whether the observed changes in G-SAS scores are meaningful, we need to determine the minimal important change (MIC)–the smallest change in score that patients perceive as important. To estimate the MIC of G-SAS, we analyzed data from 281 participants in two randomized controlled trials of Internet interventions for problem gambling. Participants completed the G-SAS both at baseline and 1 week later and rated their perceived change in gambling symptoms. We estimated the MIC using four approaches based on mean change scores, receiver operating characteristic curves, predictive modeling, and adjusted predictive modeling. When asked the anchor question about symptom changes 1 week after baseline, 52% of participants reported improvement. The MIC estimates ranged from 2.1 to 7.0 points across different approaches. Based on the predictive MIC (3.8, 95% CI 3.2 to 4.4) and adjusted predictive MIC (3.8, 95% CI 2.6 to 4.8), which are expected to be more unbiased than the others, we recommend a four-point reduction as the MIC of the G-SAS.

International Gambling StudiesVol. 25(2)
Fukushima Medical University (JP), Kyoto University (JP), Okayama Psychiatric Medical Center (JP), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Scientific Research WorkS Peer Support Group, University of Human Environments (JP)
Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Gambling Behavior and Treatments
6.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.