Modeling the Critical Success Path of Practitioners’ Support for Student Development in Practitioner–Instructor Collaborations

To balance the theoretical knowledge garnered by students in higher education institutions (HEIs) with the competencies required by the industry, researchers have suggested the concerted input of communities of practice (i.e., construction practitioners). This can be achieved through practitioners’ provision of instructors’ course-support needs toward student development. However, some factors could influence the successful participation of practitioners in meeting instructors’ course-support needs. Therefore, the study modeled the critical success path of practitioners’ support for student development in practitioner–instructor collaborations. A questionnaire survey was used to conduct an empirical analysis to test the conceptual model. A total of 253 practitioners in the US construction industry participated in the study. Using the software and the partial least-squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) technique, the study identified the critical factors and modeled a success path for practitioners’ provision of instructors’ course-support needs. In modeling the success path, the study revealed that institution-related factors should not be considered. The results of the analysis revealed that student-related factors are significant and have a moderate influence (R2) of 22.4% on specific course-support-related factors. Similarly, the instructor-related factors have a significant impact (R2=43.4%) and large effect (β=0.659 and f2=0.766) on the student-related factors. The practical applications of the proposed model can be utilized by HEIs, instructors, and practitioners to successfully manage practitioners’ provision of instructors’ course-support needs. The findings will aid student development in practitioner–instructor collaborations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Civil Engineering Education
Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jceecd.eieng-2111
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.14
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling the Critical Success Path of Practitioners’ Support for Student Development in Practitioner–Instructor Collaborations

Anthony Yusuf, Andrea Ofori‐Boadu, Sheryl Ball, Abiola Akanmu et al.
1 citations
Journal of Civil Engineering Education
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
1.14
article

Modeling the Critical Success Path of Practitioners’ Support for Student Development in Practitioner–Instructor Collaborations

Anthony Yusuf, Andrea Ofori‐Boadu, Sheryl Ball, Abiola Akanmu, Adedeji Olushola Afolabi, Homero Murzi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

To balance the theoretical knowledge garnered by students in higher education institutions (HEIs) with the competencies required by the industry, researchers have suggested the concerted input of communities of practice (i.e., construction practitioners). This can be achieved through practitioners’ provision of instructors’ course-support needs toward student development. However, some factors could influence the successful participation of practitioners in meeting instructors’ course-support needs. Therefore, the study modeled the critical success path of practitioners’ support for student development in practitioner–instructor collaborations. A questionnaire survey was used to conduct an empirical analysis to test the conceptual model. A total of 253 practitioners in the US construction industry participated in the study. Using the software and the partial least-squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) technique, the study identified the critical factors and modeled a success path for practitioners’ provision of instructors’ course-support needs. In modeling the success path, the study revealed that institution-related factors should not be considered. The results of the analysis revealed that student-related factors are significant and have a moderate influence (R2) of 22.4% on specific course-support-related factors. Similarly, the instructor-related factors have a significant impact (R2=43.4%) and large effect (β=0.659 and f2=0.766) on the student-related factors. The practical applications of the proposed model can be utilized by HEIs, instructors, and practitioners to successfully manage practitioners’ provision of instructors’ course-support needs. The findings will aid student development in practitioner–instructor collaborations.

Journal of Civil Engineering EducationVol. 151(3)
North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University (US), Virginia Tech (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
1.14
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.