Redefining Olympic Horizons: A Quantitative Framework for Evaluating and Prioritizing Future Sports Disciplines

Our team developed a hierarchical analytical model (Hierarchical Analysis Methodology) to evaluate SDEs based on the criteria of popularity, accessibility, gender equality, sustainability, inclusiveness, relevance, innovation, safety, and fair play as specified by the Olympic Committee to inform decision-making on future Olympic Games programs. The model provides a data-driven framework to ensure the selected SDEs are consistent with the Olympic values. To test the model, we evaluated four SDEs that have been added in recent years: Boxing, Cricket, BMX Freestyle Cycling, and Karate, as well as four traditional Olympic sports: Racketball, Judo, Canoe Sprint, and Archery. Additionally, we conducted a sensitivity analysis to assess the robustness of our model. We found high sensitivity in Safety, Fair Play, and Relevance Innovation, indicating the model's ability to prioritize sports aligned with key Olympic values. However, lower sensitivity in Popularity and Gender Equity suggests a potential limitation, which could be addressed in future refinements. Based on the results, we recommend Breaking, Equestrian Driving, and Rugby Union as new additions for the 2032 Olympics in Brisbane. Breaking is the top choice due to its high appeal among younger audiences. For future consideration in the 2036 Olympics, Water Motorsports and Field Handball show potential as they align well with evolving trends and inclusivity goals.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Engineering Technology Research
Published
2025-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56028/aetr.13.1.1121.2025
Primary Topic
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Redefining Olympic Horizons: A Quantitative Framework for Evaluating and Prioritizing Future Sports Disciplines

Jen‐Jia Lin, T Xie, Junhao Liu, Ziyan Zhu
1 links
Advances in Engineering Technology Research
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
article

Redefining Olympic Horizons: A Quantitative Framework for Evaluating and Prioritizing Future Sports Disciplines

Jen‐Jia Lin, T Xie, Junhao Liu, Ziyan Zhu
article en

Abstract

Our team developed a hierarchical analytical model (Hierarchical Analysis Methodology) to evaluate SDEs based on the criteria of popularity, accessibility, gender equality, sustainability, inclusiveness, relevance, innovation, safety, and fair play as specified by the Olympic Committee to inform decision-making on future Olympic Games programs. The model provides a data-driven framework to ensure the selected SDEs are consistent with the Olympic values. To test the model, we evaluated four SDEs that have been added in recent years: Boxing, Cricket, BMX Freestyle Cycling, and Karate, as well as four traditional Olympic sports: Racketball, Judo, Canoe Sprint, and Archery. Additionally, we conducted a sensitivity analysis to assess the robustness of our model. We found high sensitivity in Safety, Fair Play, and Relevance Innovation, indicating the model's ability to prioritize sports aligned with key Olympic values. However, lower sensitivity in Popularity and Gender Equity suggests a potential limitation, which could be addressed in future refinements. Based on the results, we recommend Breaking, Equestrian Driving, and Rugby Union as new additions for the 2032 Olympics in Brisbane. Breaking is the top choice due to its high appeal among younger audiences. For future consideration in the 2036 Olympics, Water Motorsports and Field Handball show potential as they align well with evolving trends and inclusivity goals.

Advances in Engineering Technology ResearchVol. 13(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Redefining Olympic Horizons: A Quantitative Framework for Evaluating and Prioritizing Future Sports Disciplines — Jen‐Jia Lin, T Xie, et al. · Advances in Engineering Technology Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS