Comparative Performance of Burr Type XII 3P, Dagum Type I 3P and Log-Logistic 3P Distributions in Modeling Ozone (O₃), PM₁₀ and PM₂.₅ Concentrations

This study investigates the suitability of three parameters continuous probability distributions-Burr Type XII 3P, Dagum Type I 3P and Log-Logistic 3P-in modeling secondary air pollutants: ozone (O₃), particulate matters (PM₁₀ and PM₂.₅) in Visakhapatnam, an urban region having rapid industrialization. By employing rigorous statistical techniques including maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) and bootstrapping, we estimate distribution parameters and validate model fit through diagnostic plots-skewness vs. kurtosis, P-P and Q-Q plots as well as goodness-of-fit test-statistics, such as Kolmogorov-Smirnov(KS), Anderson-Darling(AD) and Cramér von Mises(CvM) tests. Additional, performance metrics including Akaike information criterion(AIC), Bayesian information criterion(BIC), evaluation metrics like mean absolute error(MAE), mean absolute percentage error(MAPE), mean squared error(MSE), root mean squared error(RMSE) and coefficient of determination(R²) and cross-validation, were also applied to ensure model robustness. Results indicate that the Burr Type XII 3P distribution most effectively models the high variability and skewed nature of O₃ concentrations, while the Dagum Type I 3P distribution provides the best fit for PM₁₀ and both Burr Type XII 3P and Log-Logistic 3P distributions are suitable for PM₂.₅. These findings offer new insights into the behavior of secondary pollutants, supporting the development of robust air quality monitoring frameworks. R software facilitated all numerical analyses and visualizations of data suited to environmental data modeling.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Research Journal of Chemistry and Environment
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25303/294rjce039056
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Performance of Burr Type XII 3P, Dagum Type I 3P and Log-Logistic 3P Distributions in Modeling Ozone (O₃), PM₁₀ and PM₂.₅ Concentrations

M. Ramanaiah, Ravi Sarode, Sridhar Akiri, Arun Kumar Saripalli et al.
1 citations
Research Journal of Chemistry and Environment
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
0.80
article

Comparative Performance of Burr Type XII 3P, Dagum Type I 3P and Log-Logistic 3P Distributions in Modeling Ozone (O₃), PM₁₀ and PM₂.₅ Concentrations

M. Ramanaiah, Ravi Sarode, Sridhar Akiri, Arun Kumar Saripalli, B. V. Nagarjuna Vasili
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the suitability of three parameters continuous probability distributions-Burr Type XII 3P, Dagum Type I 3P and Log-Logistic 3P-in modeling secondary air pollutants: ozone (O₃), particulate matters (PM₁₀ and PM₂.₅) in Visakhapatnam, an urban region having rapid industrialization. By employing rigorous statistical techniques including maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) and bootstrapping, we estimate distribution parameters and validate model fit through diagnostic plots-skewness vs. kurtosis, P-P and Q-Q plots as well as goodness-of-fit test-statistics, such as Kolmogorov-Smirnov(KS), Anderson-Darling(AD) and Cramér von Mises(CvM) tests. Additional, performance metrics including Akaike information criterion(AIC), Bayesian information criterion(BIC), evaluation metrics like mean absolute error(MAE), mean absolute percentage error(MAPE), mean squared error(MSE), root mean squared error(RMSE) and coefficient of determination(R²) and cross-validation, were also applied to ensure model robustness. Results indicate that the Burr Type XII 3P distribution most effectively models the high variability and skewed nature of O₃ concentrations, while the Dagum Type I 3P distribution provides the best fit for PM₁₀ and both Burr Type XII 3P and Log-Logistic 3P distributions are suitable for PM₂.₅. These findings offer new insights into the behavior of secondary pollutants, supporting the development of robust air quality monitoring frameworks. R software facilitated all numerical analyses and visualizations of data suited to environmental data modeling.

Research Journal of Chemistry and EnvironmentVol. 29(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
0.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.