Stakeholder engagement with <scp>AI</scp> service interactions

Abstract Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have ushered in a wave of AI innovations in the form of embodied conversational agents. These stakeholders offer new ways to engage customers in the co‐creation of services but still face significant customer skepticism. To address this challenge, we frame interactions between customers and embodied conversational agents through the lens of stakeholder engagement and apply the concept of proxy agency from social cognitive theory. This framework allows us to identify two primary stakeholder roles for embodied conversational agents: partner and servant. We conceptualize how these roles inform optimal design for embodied conversational agents and shape a two‐stage value‐by‐proxy process, comprising proxy efficacy and outcome expectancy. Additionally, we uncover tensions within this process due to over‐reliance on AI, as well as significant outcomes that extend beyond the immediate interaction. Our study, using a custom‐developed embodied conversational agent with a sample of 596 U.S.‐based respondents, reveals that positioning an embodied conversational agent in a partner role, combined with a human (vs. robot) appearance and emotional (vs. functional) conversation style, has the strongest positive impact on perceived value‐by‐proxy, usage and advice implementation intentions, and willingness to pay. We also observe an inverted U‐shaped moderation by reliance in the relationship between proxy efficacy and outcome expectancy, signaling the potential risks of over‐reliance on AI. Furthermore, we provide qualitative insights into why some customers avoid engaging with embodied conversational agents. Overall, we offer a nuanced perspective on embodied conversational agents as active stakeholders within organizational systems, advancing both theoretical understanding and practical applications of this rapidly evolving technology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Product Innovation Management
Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12786
Citations
4
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.92
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stakeholder engagement with AI service interactions

Terrence Chong, Ko de Ruyter, Tim Hilken, Ting Yu et al.
4 citations
Journal of Product Innovation Management
AI in Service Interactions
9.92
article

Stakeholder engagement with AI service interactions

Terrence Chong, Ko de Ruyter, Tim Hilken, Ting Yu, Debbie Keeling
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have ushered in a wave of AI innovations in the form of embodied conversational agents. These stakeholders offer new ways to engage customers in the co‐creation of services but still face significant customer skepticism. To address this challenge, we frame interactions between customers and embodied conversational agents through the lens of stakeholder engagement and apply the concept of proxy agency from social cognitive theory. This framework allows us to identify two primary stakeholder roles for embodied conversational agents: partner and servant. We conceptualize how these roles inform optimal design for embodied conversational agents and shape a two‐stage value‐by‐proxy process, comprising proxy efficacy and outcome expectancy. Additionally, we uncover tensions within this process due to over‐reliance on AI, as well as significant outcomes that extend beyond the immediate interaction. Our study, using a custom‐developed embodied conversational agent with a sample of 596 U.S.‐based respondents, reveals that positioning an embodied conversational agent in a partner role, combined with a human (vs. robot) appearance and emotional (vs. functional) conversation style, has the strongest positive impact on perceived value‐by‐proxy, usage and advice implementation intentions, and willingness to pay. We also observe an inverted U‐shaped moderation by reliance in the relationship between proxy efficacy and outcome expectancy, signaling the potential risks of over‐reliance on AI. Furthermore, we provide qualitative insights into why some customers avoid engaging with embodied conversational agents. Overall, we offer a nuanced perspective on embodied conversational agents as active stakeholders within organizational systems, advancing both theoretical understanding and practical applications of this rapidly evolving technology.

Journal of Product Innovation ManagementVol. 43(1)
University of Sussex (GB), King's College London (GB), Maastricht School of Management (NL), UNSW Sydney (AU), Maastricht University (NL), King's College School (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
AI in Service Interactions
9.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.