Comparison study of PFAS in farmed and wild shrimps from Brazil. Are wild shrimps less contaminated than farmed shrimps?

Production and consumption of seafood (such as shrimp) are in increasing demand in Brazil, giving rise to open ocean fisheries in addition to aquaculture. Per – and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a group of persistent organic pollutants, widely present in the environment, which have adverse effects on human health. Due to the abundant sources of PFAS, shrimps from open ocean fisheries and aquaculture might show different levels and species of PFAS, however, little is available on this topic from the Southern Hemisphere. In this study, farmed and wild shrimps were investigated for more than 30 different legacy and precursor PFAS. We also evaluated extractable organofluorine (EOF), inorganic fluoride, and total fluorine to use a mass balance approach to verify the agreement of the sum of the species with the total fluorine content. Farmed shrimps overall (whole, carapace, tissue) contained a similar concentration of target sum of PFAS when compared to the wild one (2.2 ± 2.4 ng g −1 and 2.7 ± 1.6 ng g −1 respectively, p > 0.05). PFPS and PFdDA were observed only in wild shrimps, while PFNS and PFHpA were observed only in the farmed ones. PFOA, PFDA, PFuDA, PFtrDA and MetFOSAA were found in both types of shrimps. Target PFAS contributed a maximum of 3.9 % of EOF content. Wild shrimps contained almost double the EOF concentration than farmed shrimps (424 ± 104 ng F g −1 and 231 ± 63 ng F g −1 ). PFAS intake through shrimp consumption was calculated to be below the tolerable weekly intake (4.4 ng kg −1 bodyweight, defined by EFSA) using the sum of targeted PFAS, while using EOF it was orders of magnitude higher (between 150 and 1500 ng kg −1 bodyweight), implying potential risk from the exposure to organofluorines. • Farmed and wild shrimps contained similar concentrations of sum of target PFAS. • Wild shrimps contained significantly higher extractable organic fluorine and total fluorine than farmed shrimps. • Target analysis accounted for a max of 3.9 % of extractable organofluorine. • Extractable organofluorine accounted for max 35.6 % of total fluorine. • Organofluorine intake could be orders of magnitude higher than the human tolerable weekly intake.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Food Composition and Analysis
Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2025.107546
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.86

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison study of PFAS in farmed and wild shrimps from Brazil. Are wild shrimps less contaminated than farmed shrimps?

Fernanda P. Balbinot, Andrew Kindness, Wladiana O. Matos, Márcia F. Mesko et al.
1 citations
Journal of Food Composition and Analysis
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
0.86
article

Comparison study of PFAS in farmed and wild shrimps from Brazil. Are wild shrimps less contaminated than farmed shrimps?

Fernanda P. Balbinot, Andrew Kindness, Wladiana O. Matos, Márcia F. Mesko, Jörg Feldmann, Marc Preihs, Francisco Luan Fonsêca da Silva, Viktoria Müller
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Production and consumption of seafood (such as shrimp) are in increasing demand in Brazil, giving rise to open ocean fisheries in addition to aquaculture. Per – and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a group of persistent organic pollutants, widely present in the environment, which have adverse effects on human health. Due to the abundant sources of PFAS, shrimps from open ocean fisheries and aquaculture might show different levels and species of PFAS, however, little is available on this topic from the Southern Hemisphere. In this study, farmed and wild shrimps were investigated for more than 30 different legacy and precursor PFAS. We also evaluated extractable organofluorine (EOF), inorganic fluoride, and total fluorine to use a mass balance approach to verify the agreement of the sum of the species with the total fluorine content. Farmed shrimps overall (whole, carapace, tissue) contained a similar concentration of target sum of PFAS when compared to the wild one (2.2 ± 2.4 ng g −1 and 2.7 ± 1.6 ng g −1 respectively, p > 0.05). PFPS and PFdDA were observed only in wild shrimps, while PFNS and PFHpA were observed only in the farmed ones. PFOA, PFDA, PFuDA, PFtrDA and MetFOSAA were found in both types of shrimps. Target PFAS contributed a maximum of 3.9 % of EOF content. Wild shrimps contained almost double the EOF concentration than farmed shrimps (424 ± 104 ng F g −1 and 231 ± 63 ng F g −1 ). PFAS intake through shrimp consumption was calculated to be below the tolerable weekly intake (4.4 ng kg −1 bodyweight, defined by EFSA) using the sum of targeted PFAS, while using EOF it was orders of magnitude higher (between 150 and 1500 ng kg −1 bodyweight), implying potential risk from the exposure to organofluorines. • Farmed and wild shrimps contained similar concentrations of sum of target PFAS. • Wild shrimps contained significantly higher extractable organic fluorine and total fluorine than farmed shrimps. • Target analysis accounted for a max of 3.9 % of extractable organofluorine. • Extractable organofluorine accounted for max 35.6 % of total fluorine. • Organofluorine intake could be orders of magnitude higher than the human tolerable weekly intake.

Journal of Food Composition and AnalysisVol. 143
James Hutton Institute (GB), University of Graz (AT), Universidade Federal de Pelotas (BR), Universidade Federal do Ceará (BR), Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz (BR), University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Macaulay Development Trust
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
0.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.