The readiness potential reflects detailed prediction of action outcome

The sensory input arising from our own movements is predictable to varying degrees. This predictability plays a role in action selection, initiation, and the evaluation of action outcomes, and should therefore influence neural processing both before and after movement. Here, we examined the effect of sensory predictability on pre- and post-movement processing, as reflected in two signals in the human electroencephalogram (EEG): the<i>Readiness Potential</i>(RP) and the<i>post-movement beta rebound</i>(PMBR). Thirty-six participants performed self-paced button presses in three conditions, in which they received either highly predictable auditory feedback (always the same sound), weakly predictable auditory feedback (an unpredictable, pseudo-random sound), or no auditory feedback. In the former two conditions, 20% of button presses unexpectedly elicited no sound. In these omission trials, we observed brain responses, which indicated that participants formed sensory predictions of a varying level of detail. Crucially, RP amplitude was increased when button presses always produced the same sound, compared to pseudo-random sounds, or no sound, with the latter two conditions showing no difference. In contrast, the PMBR was unchanged across conditions. Our results indicate that the specificity of sensory prediction influences the pre-movement processes reflected in the RP, even when these details are not task-relevant.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Imaging Neuroscience
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1162/imag_a_00546
Citations
3
Primary Topic
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.29

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The readiness potential reflects detailed prediction of action outcome

Tjerk Dercksen, Max‐Philipp Stenner, Nicole Wetzel, Andreas Widmann et al.
3 citations
Imaging Neuroscience
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
4.29
article

The readiness potential reflects detailed prediction of action outcome

Tjerk Dercksen, Max‐Philipp Stenner, Nicole Wetzel, Andreas Widmann, Christoph Gärtner
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The sensory input arising from our own movements is predictable to varying degrees. This predictability plays a role in action selection, initiation, and the evaluation of action outcomes, and should therefore influence neural processing both before and after movement. Here, we examined the effect of sensory predictability on pre- and post-movement processing, as reflected in two signals in the human electroencephalogram (EEG): the<i>Readiness Potential</i>(RP) and the<i>post-movement beta rebound</i>(PMBR). Thirty-six participants performed self-paced button presses in three conditions, in which they received either highly predictable auditory feedback (always the same sound), weakly predictable auditory feedback (an unpredictable, pseudo-random sound), or no auditory feedback. In the former two conditions, 20% of button presses unexpectedly elicited no sound. In these omission trials, we observed brain responses, which indicated that participants formed sensory predictions of a varying level of detail. Crucially, RP amplitude was increased when button presses always produced the same sound, compared to pseudo-random sounds, or no sound, with the latter two conditions showing no difference. In contrast, the PMBR was unchanged across conditions. Our results indicate that the specificity of sensory prediction influences the pre-movement processes reflected in the RP, even when these details are not task-relevant.

Imaging NeuroscienceVol. 3
Klinikum Magdeburg (DE), Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences (DE), Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Hochschule Magdeburg-Stendal (DE), Leipzig University (DE), Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (DE), Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology (DE)
Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Leibniz-Gemeinschaft, European Regional Development Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
4.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.