Structure of linguistic personality: psycholinguistic and ethnolinguistic aspects

Lingual personality is a key concept in a number of areas of linguistic research, including psycholinguistics and ethnolinguistics. It has a long tradition of use and various terminologi- cal designations: personality, person, individual, which indicate a speaker, a native speaker, a subject of lingual activity, a person with speech peculiarities, a subject with psychological peculiarities. These concepts reflect the theoretical-applied aspect of the study of language ability in the process of development or correction, and are also used in the study of typo- logical features of language systems. The term lingual personality actively functions in the Eastern European scientific discourse in studies devoted to the ethnical and cultural, and mental-worldview features of the speaker. However, in the psycholinguistic and ethnolin- guistics paradigm, the term linguistic personality needs definition and categorization. The purpose of the article is to define and categorize the concept of a lingual persona- lity, to establish its structure as a carrier of lingual consciousness, to propose a sample de- scription of the constituents of a lingual personality based on their component composition, to establish a relationship between them. The comparative-typological method was used to describe the structural levels and constituents of the lingual consciousness of the individual, as well as the method of component and comparative analysis of their semantic structure. The definition of linguistic personality is proposed, the components of its consciousness (mythological units, symbols, concepts, memes) are established, and their interaction is determined. The components of linguistic consciousness represent the sphere of the sacred (subconscious) and the profane (empirical, conscious). The composition and interre la tionship and conditionality of the components of linguistic consciousness reveal the ethno-psychological features of the individual. The conception, based on the developed methodology of fixing the key constituents of language consciousness, gives reasons to go beyond the research of the process of formation of individual competences of a lingual personality and allows you to create a typological model of a formed language personality as a representative or bearer of the consciousness of society or ethnicity. Keywords: lingual personality, lingual (language) ability, lingual consciousness, mythological unit, symbol, concept, meme.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Ukrainska mova
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15407/ukrmova2025.01.003
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Structure of linguistic personality: psycholinguistic and ethnolinguistic aspects

Володимир Барчук
Ukrainska mova
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
article

Structure of linguistic personality: psycholinguistic and ethnolinguistic aspects

Володимир Барчук
article en

Abstract

Lingual personality is a key concept in a number of areas of linguistic research, including psycholinguistics and ethnolinguistics. It has a long tradition of use and various terminologi- cal designations: personality, person, individual, which indicate a speaker, a native speaker, a subject of lingual activity, a person with speech peculiarities, a subject with psychological peculiarities. These concepts reflect the theoretical-applied aspect of the study of language ability in the process of development or correction, and are also used in the study of typo- logical features of language systems. The term lingual personality actively functions in the Eastern European scientific discourse in studies devoted to the ethnical and cultural, and mental-worldview features of the speaker. However, in the psycholinguistic and ethnolin- guistics paradigm, the term linguistic personality needs definition and categorization. The purpose of the article is to define and categorize the concept of a lingual persona- lity, to establish its structure as a carrier of lingual consciousness, to propose a sample de- scription of the constituents of a lingual personality based on their component composition, to establish a relationship between them. The comparative-typological method was used to describe the structural levels and constituents of the lingual consciousness of the individual, as well as the method of component and comparative analysis of their semantic structure. The definition of linguistic personality is proposed, the components of its consciousness (mythological units, symbols, concepts, memes) are established, and their interaction is determined. The components of linguistic consciousness represent the sphere of the sacred (subconscious) and the profane (empirical, conscious). The composition and interre la tionship and conditionality of the components of linguistic consciousness reveal the ethno-psychological features of the individual. The conception, based on the developed methodology of fixing the key constituents of language consciousness, gives reasons to go beyond the research of the process of formation of individual competences of a lingual personality and allows you to create a typological model of a formed language personality as a representative or bearer of the consciousness of society or ethnicity. Keywords: lingual personality, lingual (language) ability, lingual consciousness, mythological unit, symbol, concept, meme.

Ukrainska mova(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.