Evaluating the Efficacy of Base Models for Technostress Detection

The widespread use of technology has led to an increase in technostress which is a phenomenon where individuals experience stress and anxiety due to their interactions with technology. As social media platforms become increasingly integral to daily life, detecting technostress from online interactions has become a pressing concern and an avenue to enrich the research in the area of detecting technostress. This study evaluates the performance of selected base models on X (Twitter data). Also, the study investigated the effectiveness of a feature extraction technique for the improvement of the model performance through data preprocessing. The study made use of the dataset of X posts (Sentiment140) obtained from the Standford University. The extracted features were used to train and evaluate four base models: Random Forest (RF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), Gradient Boosting (GB), and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM). The performance of each model was evaluated based on accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score and Kappa statistics. The RF model outperformed other base models with accuracy, precision, recall, f1-score, and Kappa score values of 88.03%, 85.98%, 85.68%, 85.79% and 79.81% respectively. The results highlight the importance of preprocessing and feature extraction techniques in improving model performance; contributes to the development of more effective technostress detection systems and provide insights into the application of machine learning algorithms for analysing online interactions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International journal of research and scientific innovation
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51244/ijrsi.2025.12030044
Primary Topic
Technostress in Professional Settings
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the Efficacy of Base Models for Technostress Detection

Onuiri Ernest, Ogu Emmanuel, Oladipo Sunday, Ayankoya Folasade
International journal of research and scientific innovation
Technostress in Professional Settings
article

Evaluating the Efficacy of Base Models for Technostress Detection

Onuiri Ernest, Ogu Emmanuel, Oladipo Sunday, Ayankoya Folasade
article en

Abstract

The widespread use of technology has led to an increase in technostress which is a phenomenon where individuals experience stress and anxiety due to their interactions with technology. As social media platforms become increasingly integral to daily life, detecting technostress from online interactions has become a pressing concern and an avenue to enrich the research in the area of detecting technostress. This study evaluates the performance of selected base models on X (Twitter data). Also, the study investigated the effectiveness of a feature extraction technique for the improvement of the model performance through data preprocessing. The study made use of the dataset of X posts (Sentiment140) obtained from the Standford University. The extracted features were used to train and evaluate four base models: Random Forest (RF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), Gradient Boosting (GB), and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM). The performance of each model was evaluated based on accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score and Kappa statistics. The RF model outperformed other base models with accuracy, precision, recall, f1-score, and Kappa score values of 88.03%, 85.98%, 85.68%, 85.79% and 79.81% respectively. The results highlight the importance of preprocessing and feature extraction techniques in improving model performance; contributes to the development of more effective technostress detection systems and provide insights into the application of machine learning algorithms for analysing online interactions.

International journal of research and scientific innovationVol. XII(III)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Technostress in Professional Settings
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.