Integrating Rational and Emotional Risk Management: A Stepwise Approach and Practical Implications

Decisions in complex systems need support from formal risk management. Traditional risk management, based on a "rational" idea of risk (the actual damage linked with probabilities), often diverges from public perceptions, leading to conflict between expert-led evaluations and societal acceptance. Two research directions have emerged to bridge this gap: enhancing stakeholder participation in risk management and incorporating emotional factors into risk assessment. Building on these efforts, we propose a systematic methodology integrating stakeholders' emotional considerations into formal risk management. Our approach combines a refined risk conceptualization with a structured stakeholder engagement process. An illustrative example involving an ammonia plant site-selection risk problem is presented to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed approach. The proposed approach offers a potential way to resolve conflicts and enhance public trust in risk management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Safety Science and Resilience
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnlssr.2025.02.004
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Risk Perception and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating Rational and Emotional Risk Management: A Stepwise Approach and Practical Implications

Genserik Reniers, Ming Yang, Yuanyuan Xu
1 citations
Journal of Safety Science and Resilience
Risk Perception and Management
4.20
article

Integrating Rational and Emotional Risk Management: A Stepwise Approach and Practical Implications

Genserik Reniers, Ming Yang, Yuanyuan Xu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Decisions in complex systems need support from formal risk management. Traditional risk management, based on a "rational" idea of risk (the actual damage linked with probabilities), often diverges from public perceptions, leading to conflict between expert-led evaluations and societal acceptance. Two research directions have emerged to bridge this gap: enhancing stakeholder participation in risk management and incorporating emotional factors into risk assessment. Building on these efforts, we propose a systematic methodology integrating stakeholders' emotional considerations into formal risk management. Our approach combines a refined risk conceptualization with a structured stakeholder engagement process. An illustrative example involving an ammonia plant site-selection risk problem is presented to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed approach. The proposed approach offers a potential way to resolve conflicts and enhance public trust in risk management.

Journal of Safety Science and Resilience
University of Antwerp (BE), Delft University of Technology (NL), KU Leuven (BE)
China Scholarship Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Risk Perception and Management
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Integrating Rational and Emotional Risk Management: A Stepwise Approach and Practical Implications — Genserik Reniers, Ming Yang, et al. · Journal of Safety Science and Resilience (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS