Testing the real-world utility of Bayes theorem in artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram algorithm for the detection of left ventricular systolic dysfunction

To assess how the theoretical principles of Bayes' theorem hold true in a clinically impactful way when testing the diagnostic performance of an artificial intelligence (AI) tool, using the case of the AI-enabled electrocardiogram (AI-ECG) screening tool that detects left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) in a “real-world” setting. We analyzed data from 42,883 consecutive patients who underwent a clinically indicated ECG and an echocardiogram within two weeks at our center between January 1st and December 31st , 2019. We then evaluated area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristics, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) of the AI-ECG to detect LVSD (left ventricle ejection fraction of ≤40 %) across (i) cumulative risk factor prevalence (pre-test probabilities) (ii) different diagnostic thresholds, using paired ECG-echocardiogram data. Prevalence of LVSD was 1.9 %, 4.0 %, 7.0 % and 13.9 % for patients with 0, 1–2, 3–4 and ≥5 risk-factors for LVSD. The AUC of the AI-ECG for each group was 0.955, 0.933, 0.901 and 0.886, respectively (p for trend<0.001). Pre-test probabilities hardly influenced sensitivity but did impact specificity. PPV was affected more than NPV, which was modestly altered. Thresholds impacted diagnostic performance parameters, although their effect on NPV at low pre-test probability was negligible. In real world, pre-test probabilities/cumulative risk-factors of disease do affect specificity. Using different diagnostic thresholds yields the highest impact on algorithm performance. A Bayesian approach may enhance individualized diagnostic performance when implementing AI algorithms. • The Bayes' theorem represents the probabilistic nature of diagnostic reasoning. • In the real-world clinical scenario, pre-test probabilities do affect specificity. • Using different thresholds yields the highest effect on diagnostic performance. • A Bayesian approach may enhance individualized diagnostic performance when implementing AI algorithms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Intelligence-Based Medicine
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmed.2025.100238
Citations
1
Primary Topic
ECG Monitoring and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Testing the real-world utility of Bayes theorem in artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram algorithm for the detection of left ventricular systolic dysfunction

Francisco López-Jiménez, David Harmon, Paul A. Friedman, Betsy J. Medina‐Inojosa et al.
1 citations
Intelligence-Based Medicine
ECG Monitoring and Analysis
1.39
article

Testing the real-world utility of Bayes theorem in artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram algorithm for the detection of left ventricular systolic dysfunction

Francisco López-Jiménez, David Harmon, Paul A. Friedman, Betsy J. Medina‐Inojosa, Rickey E. Carter, Zachi Itzhak Attia, José R. Medina‐Inojosa
article en
1 citations

Abstract

To assess how the theoretical principles of Bayes' theorem hold true in a clinically impactful way when testing the diagnostic performance of an artificial intelligence (AI) tool, using the case of the AI-enabled electrocardiogram (AI-ECG) screening tool that detects left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) in a “real-world” setting. We analyzed data from 42,883 consecutive patients who underwent a clinically indicated ECG and an echocardiogram within two weeks at our center between January 1st and December 31st , 2019. We then evaluated area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristics, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) of the AI-ECG to detect LVSD (left ventricle ejection fraction of ≤40 %) across (i) cumulative risk factor prevalence (pre-test probabilities) (ii) different diagnostic thresholds, using paired ECG-echocardiogram data. Prevalence of LVSD was 1.9 %, 4.0 %, 7.0 % and 13.9 % for patients with 0, 1–2, 3–4 and ≥5 risk-factors for LVSD. The AUC of the AI-ECG for each group was 0.955, 0.933, 0.901 and 0.886, respectively (p for trend<0.001). Pre-test probabilities hardly influenced sensitivity but did impact specificity. PPV was affected more than NPV, which was modestly altered. Thresholds impacted diagnostic performance parameters, although their effect on NPV at low pre-test probability was negligible. In real world, pre-test probabilities/cumulative risk-factors of disease do affect specificity. Using different diagnostic thresholds yields the highest impact on algorithm performance. A Bayesian approach may enhance individualized diagnostic performance when implementing AI algorithms. • The Bayes' theorem represents the probabilistic nature of diagnostic reasoning. • In the real-world clinical scenario, pre-test probabilities do affect specificity. • Using different thresholds yields the highest effect on diagnostic performance. • A Bayesian approach may enhance individualized diagnostic performance when implementing AI algorithms.

Intelligence-Based MedicineVol. 11
Emory University (US), Jacksonville College (US), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), Mayo Clinic in Florida (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
ECG Monitoring and Analysis
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.