Psychological Validation of a Standardized Odor Set for Olfactory Training

The result suggests that the average model reflects individual odor perception, supporting the psychological appropriateness of the standardized odor set. The average model may also be useful in selecting new candidate components for the standardized odor set; however, observations in healthy participants should be considered a tool to reinforce findings in clinical studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ORL
Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1159/000545368
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.93

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychological Validation of a Standardized Odor Set for Olfactory Training

Satomi Kunieda, Naomi Gotow, Takanobu Omata, Tatsu Kobayakawa
2 citations
ORL
Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
2.93
article

Psychological Validation of a Standardized Odor Set for Olfactory Training

Satomi Kunieda, Naomi Gotow, Takanobu Omata, Tatsu Kobayakawa
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The result suggests that the average model reflects individual odor perception, supporting the psychological appropriateness of the standardized odor set. The average model may also be useful in selecting new candidate components for the standardized odor set; however, observations in healthy participants should be considered a tool to reinforce findings in clinical studies.

ORLVol. 87(1)
Ritsumeikan University (JP), National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (JP)
Ritsumeikan University, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Japan Science and Technology Agency
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
2.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.