Warmer temperatures provide little benefit in offsetting cold stress in Canadian crop yields

Abstract The net effect of warmer temperatures for cold-climate agriculture remains unknown: cold temperatures disrupt production, but warmer temperatures can also bring yield-reducing extreme heat. We introduce an approach to measure cold-temperature exposure using sinusoidal degree days, an exact analog to the approach widely used to measure heat exposure. Applying this approach to model the yields of six Canadian crops, we find yield penalties to cold-temperature exposure mirror those from extreme heat. While average yields under low- and high-emission scenarios increase significantly when warmer days mitigate cold damage, these gains are too small to offset additional extreme-heat damage, and the net effect remains broadly negative. For barley, canola, oats and wheat, damages are severely negative (−28.4% to −57.8% loss). For maize and soybean, outcomes range from no distinguishable change to moderate losses (−5.2%). Additionally, yield risk increases, with higher coefficients of variation and low-yield probabilities across all scenarios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Research Letters
Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/adc9c9
Primary Topic
Plant responses to elevated CO2
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Warmer temperatures provide little benefit in offsetting cold stress in Canadian crop yields

Alan P. Ker, Tor N. Tolhurst
Environmental Research Letters
Plant responses to elevated CO2
article

Warmer temperatures provide little benefit in offsetting cold stress in Canadian crop yields

Alan P. Ker, Tor N. Tolhurst
article en

Abstract

Abstract The net effect of warmer temperatures for cold-climate agriculture remains unknown: cold temperatures disrupt production, but warmer temperatures can also bring yield-reducing extreme heat. We introduce an approach to measure cold-temperature exposure using sinusoidal degree days, an exact analog to the approach widely used to measure heat exposure. Applying this approach to model the yields of six Canadian crops, we find yield penalties to cold-temperature exposure mirror those from extreme heat. While average yields under low- and high-emission scenarios increase significantly when warmer days mitigate cold damage, these gains are too small to offset additional extreme-heat damage, and the net effect remains broadly negative. For barley, canola, oats and wheat, damages are severely negative (−28.4% to −57.8% loss). For maize and soybean, outcomes range from no distinguishable change to moderate losses (−5.2%). Additionally, yield risk increases, with higher coefficients of variation and low-yield probabilities across all scenarios.

Environmental Research LettersVol. 20(5)
Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development (US), Michigan State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Plant responses to elevated CO2
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Warmer temperatures provide little benefit in offsetting cold stress in Canadian crop yields — Alan P. Ker, Tor N. Tolhurst · Environmental Research Letters (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS