Challenges in the identification and quantitation in on-line breath analysis

The identification and quantitation of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled human breath has attracted considerable interest due to its potential application in medical diagnostics, environmental exposure assessment, and forensic applications. Secondary electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (SESI-MS) is a method capable of detecting thousands of VOCs. Nevertheless, most studies using SESI-MS for breath analysis have relied primarily on MS<sup>1</sup>measurements for identifications and quantification, which are susceptible to misassignments and errors. In this study, we targeted several endogenous compounds (C5 to C10 aldehydes, limonene and pyridine), known to occur in breath. These compounds were measured and quantified in exhaled breath from 12 volunteers over several days using three different acquisition methods: full scan, targeted selected ion monitoring and parallel reaction monitoring. These methods were used for identification and quantification by comparing with measurements of external standards. High-abundance features such as limonene and pyridine were successfully identified and quantified in exhaled human breath with all three methods, with MS<sup>2</sup>measurements supporting identification, albeit with limitations to separate between limonene and<i>α</i>-/<i>β</i>-pinene. For low-abundance features, the study highlights the challenges of false assignments in SESI-MS, even with MS<sup>2</sup>measurements. This was demonstrated in the case of aldehydes, which could not be reliably separated from isomeric ketones present in breath, leading to incorrect quantification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Breath Research
Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1752-7163/adc9da
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Challenges in the identification and quantitation in on-line breath analysis

Renato Zenobi, Stamatios Giannoukos, Timon Käser
2 citations
Journal of Breath Research
Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
1.35
article

Challenges in the identification and quantitation in on-line breath analysis

Renato Zenobi, Stamatios Giannoukos, Timon Käser
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The identification and quantitation of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled human breath has attracted considerable interest due to its potential application in medical diagnostics, environmental exposure assessment, and forensic applications. Secondary electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (SESI-MS) is a method capable of detecting thousands of VOCs. Nevertheless, most studies using SESI-MS for breath analysis have relied primarily on MS<sup>1</sup>measurements for identifications and quantification, which are susceptible to misassignments and errors. In this study, we targeted several endogenous compounds (C5 to C10 aldehydes, limonene and pyridine), known to occur in breath. These compounds were measured and quantified in exhaled breath from 12 volunteers over several days using three different acquisition methods: full scan, targeted selected ion monitoring and parallel reaction monitoring. These methods were used for identification and quantification by comparing with measurements of external standards. High-abundance features such as limonene and pyridine were successfully identified and quantified in exhaled human breath with all three methods, with MS<sup>2</sup>measurements supporting identification, albeit with limitations to separate between limonene and<i>α</i>-/<i>β</i>-pinene. For low-abundance features, the study highlights the challenges of false assignments in SESI-MS, even with MS<sup>2</sup>measurements. This was demonstrated in the case of aldehydes, which could not be reliably separated from isomeric ketones present in breath, leading to incorrect quantification.

Journal of Breath ResearchVol. 19(3)
ETH Zurich (CH)
Agroscope
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
1.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.