Mechanical Performance of Group Stud Connectors in Steel–Concrete Composite Beams with Straddle Monorail

A steel–concrete composite beam with a straddle monorail is a lightweight and easily installable structure. The mechanical performance of group stud connectors and their arrangement are key design parameters that govern the beam’s overall performance. This study investigates the behavior of group stud connectors by conducting push-out tests on four specimens, comprising three full-scale models and one 1:3 scaled model. Variables such as the number of connectors, arrangement, and specimen size were explored. The results indicated that all the specimens exhibited ductile failure due to stud shearing. The strain distribution analysis revealed higher strain at the edges and lower in the middle, persisting as the load increased. The group stud effect resulted in a 23.4% to 27.2% reduction in shear capacity for the full-scale specimens and 16.5% for the scaled specimen. The reduction was proportional to the density of the studs, but the size effects were less significant. This study provides valuable insights into the mechanical behavior of group stud connectors and offers design recommendations for practical applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15074051
Primary Topic
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mechanical Performance of Group Stud Connectors in Steel–Concrete Composite Beams with Straddle Monorail

Jiao Lei, Shuke Wang, Ji-Zhi Zhao, Yongfei Zhao et al.
Applied Sciences
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
article

Mechanical Performance of Group Stud Connectors in Steel–Concrete Composite Beams with Straddle Monorail

Jiao Lei, Shuke Wang, Ji-Zhi Zhao, Yongfei Zhao, Zhenhao Wu
article en

Abstract

A steel–concrete composite beam with a straddle monorail is a lightweight and easily installable structure. The mechanical performance of group stud connectors and their arrangement are key design parameters that govern the beam’s overall performance. This study investigates the behavior of group stud connectors by conducting push-out tests on four specimens, comprising three full-scale models and one 1:3 scaled model. Variables such as the number of connectors, arrangement, and specimen size were explored. The results indicated that all the specimens exhibited ductile failure due to stud shearing. The strain distribution analysis revealed higher strain at the edges and lower in the middle, persisting as the load increased. The group stud effect resulted in a 23.4% to 27.2% reduction in shear capacity for the full-scale specimens and 16.5% for the scaled specimen. The reduction was proportional to the density of the studs, but the size effects were less significant. This study provides valuable insights into the mechanical behavior of group stud connectors and offers design recommendations for practical applications.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(7)
Chongqing University (CN), Hunan University (CN), Donghua University (CN), Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, National Key Research and Development Program of China, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Mechanical Performance of Group Stud Connectors in Steel–Concrete Composite Beams with Straddle Monorail — Jiao Lei, Shuke Wang, et al. · Applied Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS