Estimated Impact Of Medically Tailored Meals On Health Care Use And Expenditures In 50 US States

Medically tailored meals (MTMs) can reduce health care use among high-risk patients with diet-related conditions. However, the potential impact of providing coverage for MTMs across fifty US states remains unknown. Using a population-based, open-cohort simulation model, we estimated state-specific one-year and five-year changes in annual hospitalizations, health care spending, and cost-effectiveness of MTMs for patients with diet-related diseases and limitations in activities of daily living, covered by Medicaid, Medicare, or private insurance. Assuming full uptake among eligible people, MTMs were net cost saving in the first year in forty-nine states, with the largest savings seen in Connecticut ($6,299 per patient). The exception was Alabama, where MTMs were cost-neutral. The number of treated patients needed to avert one hospitalization ranged from 2.3 (Maryland) to 6.9 (Colorado). These findings can inform state-level policy makers and health plans considering MTM coverage through state-specific strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Affairs
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2024.01307
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Healthcare Policy and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
34.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimated Impact Of Medically Tailored Meals On Health Care Use And Expenditures In 50 US States

Kurt Hager, Shuyue Deng, Frederick Cudhea, John B. Wong et al.
11 citations
Health Affairs
Healthcare Policy and Management
34.44
article

Estimated Impact Of Medically Tailored Meals On Health Care Use And Expenditures In 50 US States

Kurt Hager, Shuyue Deng, Frederick Cudhea, John B. Wong, Lu Wang, David D. Kim, Dariush Mozaffarian
article en
11 citations

Abstract

Medically tailored meals (MTMs) can reduce health care use among high-risk patients with diet-related conditions. However, the potential impact of providing coverage for MTMs across fifty US states remains unknown. Using a population-based, open-cohort simulation model, we estimated state-specific one-year and five-year changes in annual hospitalizations, health care spending, and cost-effectiveness of MTMs for patients with diet-related diseases and limitations in activities of daily living, covered by Medicaid, Medicare, or private insurance. Assuming full uptake among eligible people, MTMs were net cost saving in the first year in forty-nine states, with the largest savings seen in Connecticut ($6,299 per patient). The exception was Alabama, where MTMs were cost-neutral. The number of treated patients needed to avert one hospitalization ranged from 2.3 (Maryland) to 6.9 (Colorado). These findings can inform state-level policy makers and health plans considering MTM coverage through state-specific strategies.

Health AffairsVol. 44(4)
Tufts University (US), Tufts Medical Center (US), University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US), University of Chicago (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Healthcare Policy and Management
34.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.