Comparative assessment of soft computing and SVM architectures for multi-class automobile engine fault classification

Abstract The advancing complexity of automobile structure and continuous evolvement of automobile functionality has increased the difficulties of automobile fault diagnosis. This study investigates the effectiveness and efficiency of particle swarm optimization-based adaptive neurofuzzy inference system (PSO-ANFIS) models in offline automobile fault diagnosis. The results of this model were compared with error-correcting output code (ECOC) support vector machines with one-vs-one (ECOC-SVM-OVO) and one-vs-all (ECOC-SVM-OVA) based structures, probabilistic neural network (PNN), and standalone adaptive neurofuzzy inference system (ANFIS). Fifty cars were diagnosed, symptoms were classified into ten (10), and coded in binary forms, while likely faults were grouped into 10. The models were evaluated against relevant classification performance metrics and computational time. Similar performance metrics were obtained for the ECOC-SVM-OVO, ECOC-SVM-OVA, PNN and PSO-ANFIS models (accuracy = 1, error = 0, specificity = 1, false positive rate = 0, kappa statistic = 1). The standalone ANFIS model performed the least (accuracy = 0.75, error = 0.25, specificity = 0.97, false positive rate = 0.03, kappa statistic = 0.21), though at the least computational time (2.57 s). Although standalone ANFIS and PSO-ANFIS models could be used as classification models, their efficiencies and effectiveness are lower than those of the PNN and SVM architectures in this study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Systems Assurance Engineering and Management
Published
2025-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-025-02747-y
Primary Topic
Fault Detection and Control Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative assessment of soft computing and SVM architectures for multi-class automobile engine fault classification

Obafemi O. Olatunji, Paul A. Adedeji, Nkosinathi Madushele, Johnson A. Oyewale et al.
International Journal of Systems Assurance Engineering and Management
Fault Detection and Control Systems
article

Comparative assessment of soft computing and SVM architectures for multi-class automobile engine fault classification

Obafemi O. Olatunji, Paul A. Adedeji, Nkosinathi Madushele, Johnson A. Oyewale, Tunde I. Ogedengbe
article en

Abstract

Abstract The advancing complexity of automobile structure and continuous evolvement of automobile functionality has increased the difficulties of automobile fault diagnosis. This study investigates the effectiveness and efficiency of particle swarm optimization-based adaptive neurofuzzy inference system (PSO-ANFIS) models in offline automobile fault diagnosis. The results of this model were compared with error-correcting output code (ECOC) support vector machines with one-vs-one (ECOC-SVM-OVO) and one-vs-all (ECOC-SVM-OVA) based structures, probabilistic neural network (PNN), and standalone adaptive neurofuzzy inference system (ANFIS). Fifty cars were diagnosed, symptoms were classified into ten (10), and coded in binary forms, while likely faults were grouped into 10. The models were evaluated against relevant classification performance metrics and computational time. Similar performance metrics were obtained for the ECOC-SVM-OVO, ECOC-SVM-OVA, PNN and PSO-ANFIS models (accuracy = 1, error = 0, specificity = 1, false positive rate = 0, kappa statistic = 1). The standalone ANFIS model performed the least (accuracy = 0.75, error = 0.25, specificity = 0.97, false positive rate = 0.03, kappa statistic = 0.21), though at the least computational time (2.57 s). Although standalone ANFIS and PSO-ANFIS models could be used as classification models, their efficiencies and effectiveness are lower than those of the PNN and SVM architectures in this study.

International Journal of Systems Assurance Engineering and ManagementVol. 16(5)
Federal University of Technology (NG), University of Johannesburg (ZA)
University of Johannesburg
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Fault Detection and Control Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.