The Accuracy of the Uganda National Tuberculosis and Leprosy Program diagnostic algorithm and the World Health Organisation treatment decision algorithms for childhood tuberculosis: A retrospective analysis

Diagnosing childhood pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) is a challenge. This led the Uganda National Tuberculosis and Leprosy Program (NTLP) to develop a clinical treatment decision algorithm (TDA) for children. However, there is limited data on its accuracy, and how it compares to new World Health Organization (WHO) TB TDAs for children. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the accuracy of the 2017 Uganda NTLP diagnostic algorithm with the 2022 WHO TDAs for TB among children. We analyzed four years of clinical data from children <15 years old in Kampala, Uganda. Children were classified as per National Institutes of Health (NIH) consensus definitions (Confirmed, Unconfirmed or Unlikely TB). We applied the 2017 Uganda NTLP and 2022 WHO algorithms (A with chest x-ray [CXR], B without CXR) to make a decision to treat for TB or not, and calculated the sensitivity, specificity and predictive values in reference to Confirmed vs. Unlikely TB, as well as a microbiological and composite reference standard. Of the 699 children included in this analysis, 64% (451/699) were under 5 years, 53% (373/669) were male, 12% (85/699) were Xpert Ultra positive, 11% (74/669) were HIV positive and 6% had severe acute malnutrition (SAM). The Uganda NTLP algorithm had a sensitivity of 97.9% (95% CI: 96.4-99.4) and specificity of 25.9% (95% CI: 21.2-30.7). If CXR was considered unavailable, sensitivity was 97.9% (95% CI: 96.4-99.4) and specificity 28.1% (95% CI: 23.2-33.0). In comparison, WHO TDAs had similar sensitivity to the Uganda NTLP, but algorithm A was more specific (32.2%, 95% CI: 26.9-37.5) and algorithm B was less specific (15.4%, 95% CI: 11.3-19.5). The WHO TDAs had better specificity than the NTLP algorithm with CXR, and worse specificity without CXR. Further optimization of the algorithms is needed to improve specificity and reduce over-treatment of TB in children.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Global Public Health
Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004026
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.38

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Accuracy of the Uganda National Tuberculosis and Leprosy Program diagnostic algorithm and the World Health Organisation treatment decision algorithms for childhood tuberculosis: A retrospective analysis

Jascent Nakafeero, Emma Kiconco, Gertrude Nanyonga, Swomitra K. Mohanty et al.
6 citations
PLOS Global Public Health
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
8.38
article

The Accuracy of the Uganda National Tuberculosis and Leprosy Program diagnostic algorithm and the World Health Organisation treatment decision algorithms for childhood tuberculosis: A retrospective analysis

Jascent Nakafeero, Emma Kiconco, Gertrude Nanyonga, Swomitra K. Mohanty, Devan Jaganath, Bernard Kikaire, Ernest A Oumo, Peter James Kitonsa, Ezekiel Mupere, Mary G Nabukenya Mudiope, Peter Wambi, Robert Castro, Hellen Tukamuhebwa Aanyu, Adithya Cattamanchi, Eric Wobudeya, Annet Nalutaaya, Moorine Sekadde, Deus Atwiine
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Diagnosing childhood pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) is a challenge. This led the Uganda National Tuberculosis and Leprosy Program (NTLP) to develop a clinical treatment decision algorithm (TDA) for children. However, there is limited data on its accuracy, and how it compares to new World Health Organization (WHO) TB TDAs for children. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the accuracy of the 2017 Uganda NTLP diagnostic algorithm with the 2022 WHO TDAs for TB among children. We analyzed four years of clinical data from children <15 years old in Kampala, Uganda. Children were classified as per National Institutes of Health (NIH) consensus definitions (Confirmed, Unconfirmed or Unlikely TB). We applied the 2017 Uganda NTLP and 2022 WHO algorithms (A with chest x-ray [CXR], B without CXR) to make a decision to treat for TB or not, and calculated the sensitivity, specificity and predictive values in reference to Confirmed vs. Unlikely TB, as well as a microbiological and composite reference standard. Of the 699 children included in this analysis, 64% (451/699) were under 5 years, 53% (373/669) were male, 12% (85/699) were Xpert Ultra positive, 11% (74/669) were HIV positive and 6% had severe acute malnutrition (SAM). The Uganda NTLP algorithm had a sensitivity of 97.9% (95% CI: 96.4-99.4) and specificity of 25.9% (95% CI: 21.2-30.7). If CXR was considered unavailable, sensitivity was 97.9% (95% CI: 96.4-99.4) and specificity 28.1% (95% CI: 23.2-33.0). In comparison, WHO TDAs had similar sensitivity to the Uganda NTLP, but algorithm A was more specific (32.2%, 95% CI: 26.9-37.5) and algorithm B was less specific (15.4%, 95% CI: 11.3-19.5). The WHO TDAs had better specificity than the NTLP algorithm with CXR, and worse specificity without CXR. Further optimization of the algorithms is needed to improve specificity and reduce over-treatment of TB in children.

PLOS Global Public HealthVol. 5(4)
University of California, San Francisco (US), University of California, Irvine (US), University of Utah (US), Mulago Hospital (UG), University of California System (US), Malaria Consortium (UG), Ministry of Health (UG), Infectious Diseases Institute (UG), Global Brain Health Institute (US), Makerere University (UG)
National Institutes of Health
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
8.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.