Evaluating Incontinence Abstracts: Artificial Intelligence-Generated Versus Cochrane Review
Cochrane Review's Plain Text Summaries provide clearer summaries of the incontinence literature when compared to ChatGPT, yet ChatGPT generated more comprehensive summaries. While ChatGPT can effectively summarize the medical literature, further studies can improve reader accessibility to these summaries.
Authors
- Katerina Lembrikova
- Christopher Wan
- Angelo Cadiente (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9933-2804)
- Mubashir Billah (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3920-8987)
- Charles Palmer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1252-179X)
- Abinav Udaiyar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1320-4800)
- Michael Raver (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5022-4948)
- Catherine Implicito
- Andre Ho
- Qilin Cao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7193-6047)
- Jamie Chen
Institutions
- Hackensack University Medical Center (US)
- Center for Discovery (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Urogynecology
- Published
- 2025-04-07
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1097/spv.0000000000001688
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.65