Comparison Between Antigen and Allelic <scp>HLA</scp> Mismatches, and the Risk of Acute Rejection in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Deceased donor kidney allocation relies on HLA compatibility at the antigen level, as optimal matching reduces the risk of acute rejection. Whether HLA allele-level mismatches improve, the prediction of acute rejection after transplantation remains unclear. Using data from the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA) from 2017 to 2020, HLA antigenic and allelic mismatches between recipients and deceased donors were calculated with imputation of two-field allelic equivalents undertaken where required. The discordance between antigen and allele mismatches was calculated, and oblique random survival forest models were used to predict acute rejection. Predictive performance of antigen (HLA-A, -B, -DRB1 and -DQB1), allele (HLA-A, -B, -DRB1 and -DQB1) and extended allele (HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, -DQA1 and -DQB1) models was examined using concordance index and integrated Brier scores, with variable importance calculated using permutation-based methods. Among 2644 recipients followed for a median of 1.7 years, 521 recipients (20%) experienced acute rejection. Discordant numbers of antigenic and allelic mismatches occurred in 8%, 9%, 24% and 17% of HLA-A, -B, -DRB1 and -DQB1 loci, respectively. Predictive performances were similar across all models, with concordance indices of 0.62-0.63 and integrated Brier scores of 0.09. HLA-DRB1 and -DQB1 mismatches were the strongest predictors of acute rejection across models. In patients matched at the HLA-DRB1 or -DQB1 antigen, those with allelic mismatches had similar incidences of rejection compared to those without. Allelic-level assessment of HLA compatibility did not improve the prediction of acute rejection and may disadvantage certain recipients by reclassifying them into higher mismatch categories in allocation algorithms without providing clear clinical benefit.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
HLA
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/tan.70163
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.97

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison Between Antigen and Allelic HLA Mismatches, and the Risk of Acute Rejection in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Armando Teixeira‐Pinto, Ross S. Francis, William R. Mulley, Lucy C. Sullivan et al.
2 citations
HLA
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
3.97
article

Comparison Between Antigen and Allelic HLA Mismatches, and the Risk of Acute Rejection in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Armando Teixeira‐Pinto, Ross S. Francis, William R. Mulley, Lucy C. Sullivan, Ryan Gately, A. Taverniti, Wai H. Lim, Esther Ooi, Kate Wyburn, Carmel M. Hawley, Rowena Lalji, Germaine Wong, Narelle Watson, Scott Campbell
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Deceased donor kidney allocation relies on HLA compatibility at the antigen level, as optimal matching reduces the risk of acute rejection. Whether HLA allele-level mismatches improve, the prediction of acute rejection after transplantation remains unclear. Using data from the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA) from 2017 to 2020, HLA antigenic and allelic mismatches between recipients and deceased donors were calculated with imputation of two-field allelic equivalents undertaken where required. The discordance between antigen and allele mismatches was calculated, and oblique random survival forest models were used to predict acute rejection. Predictive performance of antigen (HLA-A, -B, -DRB1 and -DQB1), allele (HLA-A, -B, -DRB1 and -DQB1) and extended allele (HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, -DQA1 and -DQB1) models was examined using concordance index and integrated Brier scores, with variable importance calculated using permutation-based methods. Among 2644 recipients followed for a median of 1.7 years, 521 recipients (20%) experienced acute rejection. Discordant numbers of antigenic and allelic mismatches occurred in 8%, 9%, 24% and 17% of HLA-A, -B, -DRB1 and -DQB1 loci, respectively. Predictive performances were similar across all models, with concordance indices of 0.62-0.63 and integrated Brier scores of 0.09. HLA-DRB1 and -DQB1 mismatches were the strongest predictors of acute rejection across models. In patients matched at the HLA-DRB1 or -DQB1 antigen, those with allelic mismatches had similar incidences of rejection compared to those without. Allelic-level assessment of HLA compatibility did not improve the prediction of acute rejection and may disadvantage certain recipients by reclassifying them into higher mismatch categories in allocation algorithms without providing clear clinical benefit.

HLAVol. 105(4)
Edith Cowan University (AU), The University of Sydney (AU), The University of Western Australia (AU), Australian Red Cross Lifeblood (AU), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (AU), Monash Medical Centre (AU), Princess Alexandra Hospital (AU), Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital (AU), Children's Hospital at Westmead (AU), Westmead Hospital (AU), Kidney Health Australia (AU), Sydney Local Health District (AU), Services Australia (AU), Children's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service (AU), Monash University (AU)
University of Queensland
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
3.97
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.