Efficacy of Ceftobiprole and Daptomycin at Bone Concentrations Against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm: Results of a Dynamic In Vitro PK/PD Model

<b>Background</b>: The presence of biofilms and low antimicrobial concentrations in bone tissue make prosthetic joint infections (PJI) difficult to treat. Ceftobiprole (CTO) has a potential role in MRSA PJI. This study evaluated the efficacy of ceftobiprole and daptomycin (DAP) alone and in combination against MRSA biofilms at expected bone tissue concentrations. We assessed whether CTO-DAP outperformed DAP combined with a non-anti-MRSA beta-lactam (cefazolin [CZO]). <b>Methods</b>: A dynamic in vitro PK/PD biofilm model (CDC biofilm reactor) was used to simulate concentrations expected in cortical bone at a standard dosing of DAP (10 mg/kg/24 h), CTO (500 mg/8 h), and CZO (2 g/8 h), and assess performance against a 48-h MRSA biofilm from two clinical isolates that cause PJI (MRSA-1811 and MRSA-1733). Time-kill curves using the log change method (Δlog<sub>10</sub> CFU/cm<sup>2</sup>) assessed antimicrobial efficacy over 56 h. Resistance emergence was monitored. <b>Results:</b> Although both monotherapies were active, neither reached bactericidal levels nor was one superior to the other (Δlog<sub>10</sub> CFU/cm<sup>2</sup> CTO vs. DAP: -1.44 ± 0.25 vs. -1.50 ± 0.01 [<i>p</i> = 0.686] and -1.55 ± 0.74 vs. -0.56 ± 0.36 [<i>p</i> = 0.108] for MRSA-1811 and MRSA-1733, respectively). Only in the MRSA-1811 isolate did the CTO-DAP combination improve the activity of each monotherapy, without achieving a synergistic effect (Δlog<sub>10</sub> CFU/cm<sup>2</sup>: CTO-DAP -2.087 ± 0.048 vs. CTO -1.436 ± 0.249 [<i>p</i> = 0.013] and vs. DAP -1.503 ± 0.011 [<i>p</i> = 0.006]). No combination therapy (CTO-DAP vs. DAP-CZO) outperformed the other in either strain. No resistant bacterial subpopulations appeared with any antibiotic regimen. <b>Conclusions:</b> At clinically relevant concentrations, ceftobiprole and daptomycin showed similar activity against MRSA biofilms. The CTO-DAP combination showed comparable efficacy to DAP-CZO.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Antibiotics
Published
2025-04-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14040386
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy of Ceftobiprole and Daptomycin at Bone Concentrations Against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm: Results of a Dynamic In Vitro PK/PD Model

Carlos Lumbreras, Mikel Mancheño‐Losa, María Ángeles Meléndez-Carmona, Jaime Lora‐Tamayo
1 citations
Antibiotics
Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
2.01
article

Efficacy of Ceftobiprole and Daptomycin at Bone Concentrations Against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm: Results of a Dynamic In Vitro PK/PD Model

Carlos Lumbreras, Mikel Mancheño‐Losa, María Ángeles Meléndez-Carmona, Jaime Lora‐Tamayo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: The presence of biofilms and low antimicrobial concentrations in bone tissue make prosthetic joint infections (PJI) difficult to treat. Ceftobiprole (CTO) has a potential role in MRSA PJI. This study evaluated the efficacy of ceftobiprole and daptomycin (DAP) alone and in combination against MRSA biofilms at expected bone tissue concentrations. We assessed whether CTO-DAP outperformed DAP combined with a non-anti-MRSA beta-lactam (cefazolin [CZO]). <b>Methods</b>: A dynamic in vitro PK/PD biofilm model (CDC biofilm reactor) was used to simulate concentrations expected in cortical bone at a standard dosing of DAP (10 mg/kg/24 h), CTO (500 mg/8 h), and CZO (2 g/8 h), and assess performance against a 48-h MRSA biofilm from two clinical isolates that cause PJI (MRSA-1811 and MRSA-1733). Time-kill curves using the log change method (Δlog<sub>10</sub> CFU/cm<sup>2</sup>) assessed antimicrobial efficacy over 56 h. Resistance emergence was monitored. <b>Results:</b> Although both monotherapies were active, neither reached bactericidal levels nor was one superior to the other (Δlog<sub>10</sub> CFU/cm<sup>2</sup> CTO vs. DAP: -1.44 ± 0.25 vs. -1.50 ± 0.01 [<i>p</i> = 0.686] and -1.55 ± 0.74 vs. -0.56 ± 0.36 [<i>p</i> = 0.108] for MRSA-1811 and MRSA-1733, respectively). Only in the MRSA-1811 isolate did the CTO-DAP combination improve the activity of each monotherapy, without achieving a synergistic effect (Δlog<sub>10</sub> CFU/cm<sup>2</sup>: CTO-DAP -2.087 ± 0.048 vs. CTO -1.436 ± 0.249 [<i>p</i> = 0.013] and vs. DAP -1.503 ± 0.011 [<i>p</i> = 0.006]). No combination therapy (CTO-DAP vs. DAP-CZO) outperformed the other in either strain. No resistant bacterial subpopulations appeared with any antibiotic regimen. <b>Conclusions:</b> At clinically relevant concentrations, ceftobiprole and daptomycin showed similar activity against MRSA biofilms. The CTO-DAP combination showed comparable efficacy to DAP-CZO.

AntibioticsVol. 14(4)
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES), Hospital Universitario 12 De Octubre (ES), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (ES)
Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica, Instituto de Salud Carlos III
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.