The public legitimacy of democratic innovations: reflections on the Global Assembly

Abstract This article discusses the legitimacy of democratic innovations based on communication practices directed to the external public. There is a movement in the field of public management toward implementing minipublics in general and specific mechanisms such as citizens’ assemblies. However, a challenge arises regarding recognizing these democratic management practices as legitimate, especially by ordinary citizens not directly involved in them. We argue that the systematic existence of external communication practices justifying both the existence of these democratic innovations and their achievements and outcomes is as fundamental as the internal procedures guiding their existence. The propositions of this article are linked to an exploratory analysis of the Global Assembly, which took place in 2021 with 100 citizens from 49 countries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Revista de Administração Pública
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-761220240134x
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The public legitimacy of democratic innovations: reflections on the Global Assembly

Filipe Mendes Motta, Ricardo Fabrino Mendonça, Lucas Henrique Nigri Veloso
Revista de Administração Pública
Social Media and Politics
article

The public legitimacy of democratic innovations: reflections on the Global Assembly

Filipe Mendes Motta, Ricardo Fabrino Mendonça, Lucas Henrique Nigri Veloso
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article discusses the legitimacy of democratic innovations based on communication practices directed to the external public. There is a movement in the field of public management toward implementing minipublics in general and specific mechanisms such as citizens’ assemblies. However, a challenge arises regarding recognizing these democratic management practices as legitimate, especially by ordinary citizens not directly involved in them. We argue that the systematic existence of external communication practices justifying both the existence of these democratic innovations and their achievements and outcomes is as fundamental as the internal procedures guiding their existence. The propositions of this article are linked to an exploratory analysis of the Global Assembly, which took place in 2021 with 100 citizens from 49 countries.

Revista de Administração PúblicaVol. 59(1)
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR), University of Padua (IT)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Social Media and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The public legitimacy of democratic innovations: reflections on the Global Assembly — Filipe Mendes Motta, Ricardo Fabrino Mendonça, et al. · Revista de Administração Pública (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS