Analysis of Paleointensity Results Under Different Interpretation Approaches: A Case Study on the Korkhi Volcanic Sequence (Lesser Caucasus, Georgia)

Abstract In this study we focus on the investigation of the absolute intensity records of two volcanic subsequences, aiming to enrich the global paleointensity database for the last 5 Ma, which currently shows important dispersion. We present new absolute paleointensities obtained from the Plio‐Pleistocene volcanic sequence of Korkhi (Djavakheti Highland, Georgia) (41°27′31″N, 43°27′55″E). Korkhi is divided into two lava flow subsequences dated at 3.11 ± 0.20 Ma and 1.85 ± 0.08 Ma. Paleomagnetic directions previously published (Sánchez‐Moreno et al., 2018, https://doi.org/10.1029/2017GC007358 ) show a normal polarity in the lower Korkhi subsequence and a reverse‐to‐intermediate polarity in the upper Korkhi subsequence. The new paleointensity determinations are obtained through two different Thellier‐type protocols (Thellier‐Thellier and IZZI) and the corrected multispecimen method. We utilize different selection criteria and interpretation approaches (TTB, CCRIT, BiCEP and multimethod), and we make a critical evaluation on their application on complex magnetic behaviors, such as often found in volcanic rocks. Finally, we obtained a paleointensity of 70 μT in upper Korkhi and 14 paleointensities in lower Korkhi that vary between 5.2 and 37.2 μT. These results agree with a recently proposed non‐Geocentric Axial Dipole (GAD) hypothesis for the last ∼1.5 Ma (Cych et al., 2023, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JB026492 ), and with low field strength for the 3–4 Ma.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2023gc011382
Primary Topic
Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of Paleointensity Results Under Different Interpretation Approaches: A Case Study on the Korkhi Volcanic Sequence (Lesser Caucasus, Georgia)

Juan Morales, Nayeli Pérez-Rodríguez, G. T. Vashakidze, Ketino Gabarashvili et al.
Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems
Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
article

Analysis of Paleointensity Results Under Different Interpretation Approaches: A Case Study on the Korkhi Volcanic Sequence (Lesser Caucasus, Georgia)

Juan Morales, Nayeli Pérez-Rodríguez, G. T. Vashakidze, Ketino Gabarashvili, Manuel Calvo‐Rathert, Néstor Vegas, V. А. Lebedev, Elisa M. Sánchez‐Moreno, Lisa Tauxe, Pierre Camps, Avto Goguitchaichvili
article en

Abstract

Abstract In this study we focus on the investigation of the absolute intensity records of two volcanic subsequences, aiming to enrich the global paleointensity database for the last 5 Ma, which currently shows important dispersion. We present new absolute paleointensities obtained from the Plio‐Pleistocene volcanic sequence of Korkhi (Djavakheti Highland, Georgia) (41°27′31″N, 43°27′55″E). Korkhi is divided into two lava flow subsequences dated at 3.11 ± 0.20 Ma and 1.85 ± 0.08 Ma. Paleomagnetic directions previously published (Sánchez‐Moreno et al., 2018, https://doi.org/10.1029/2017GC007358 ) show a normal polarity in the lower Korkhi subsequence and a reverse‐to‐intermediate polarity in the upper Korkhi subsequence. The new paleointensity determinations are obtained through two different Thellier‐type protocols (Thellier‐Thellier and IZZI) and the corrected multispecimen method. We utilize different selection criteria and interpretation approaches (TTB, CCRIT, BiCEP and multimethod), and we make a critical evaluation on their application on complex magnetic behaviors, such as often found in volcanic rocks. Finally, we obtained a paleointensity of 70 μT in upper Korkhi and 14 paleointensities in lower Korkhi that vary between 5.2 and 37.2 μT. These results agree with a recently proposed non‐Geocentric Axial Dipole (GAD) hypothesis for the last ∼1.5 Ma (Cych et al., 2023, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JB026492 ), and with low field strength for the 3–4 Ma.

Geochemistry Geophysics GeosystemsVol. 26(4)
Tbilisi State University (GE), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Scripps Institution of Oceanography (US), University of the Basque Country (ES), Université de Montpellier (FR), Institute of Geology of Ore Deposits Petrography Mineralogy and Geochemistry (RU), University of California San Diego (US), Géosciences Montpellier (FR), Universidad de Burgos (ES), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX)
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.