“No Matter What We Do, Nothing Is Enough”: A Qualitative Investigation of Political Despair

ABSTRACT People often report experiencing despair about social issues like racial inequality and climate change. We conceptualise these feelings as political despair and consider: what causes political despair, that is, what are the antecedent appraisals? Participants, who felt despair about racial inequality ( N = 196) or climate change ( N = 179), responded to a prompt about why they feel despair about this issue. A framework analysis of participants responses, guided by appraisal theories of emotion, identified two broad themes (appraisals): perceptions that the issue is unjust and systemic (illegitimate) as well as being uncontrollable and unchanging (intractable). These themes (appraisals), consisting of nuanced sub‐themes, explained political despair. The study suggests that political despair may be conceptualised as a discrete emotion with specific appraisals and a core relational theme of unchangeable systemic injustice . Understanding political despair is important given its prevalence among supporters of climate justice and racial equality, and its implications for well‐being and political engagement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology
Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.70095
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“No Matter What We Do, Nothing Is Enough”: A Qualitative Investigation of Political Despair

Emma F. Thomas, Lucy H. Bird, Michael Wenzel
2 citations
Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology
Social and Intergroup Psychology
8.40
article

“No Matter What We Do, Nothing Is Enough”: A Qualitative Investigation of Political Despair

Emma F. Thomas, Lucy H. Bird, Michael Wenzel
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT People often report experiencing despair about social issues like racial inequality and climate change. We conceptualise these feelings as political despair and consider: what causes political despair, that is, what are the antecedent appraisals? Participants, who felt despair about racial inequality ( N = 196) or climate change ( N = 179), responded to a prompt about why they feel despair about this issue. A framework analysis of participants responses, guided by appraisal theories of emotion, identified two broad themes (appraisals): perceptions that the issue is unjust and systemic (illegitimate) as well as being uncontrollable and unchanging (intractable). These themes (appraisals), consisting of nuanced sub‐themes, explained political despair. The study suggests that political despair may be conceptualised as a discrete emotion with specific appraisals and a core relational theme of unchangeable systemic injustice . Understanding political despair is important given its prevalence among supporters of climate justice and racial equality, and its implications for well‐being and political engagement.

Journal of Community & Applied Social PsychologyVol. 35(3)
Flinders University (AU)
Flinders University, Australian Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.