What drives rice farmers away from straw burning? Evidence from the Mekong Delta, Vietnam

• Straw burning is practiced by 45–84 % of rice farmers, depending on the season. • Straw burning peaks in the Winter-Spring season in An Giang province. • Larger or contract farms are more likely to practice rice straw burning. • Sustainable rice straw management is associated with income and agricultural extension. • Policymakers can leverage sustainable straw management through contracting companies. The Asian mega deltas are critical for food security since they are among the most productive regions for rice cultivation globally. However, this comes at the expense of their environment. Rice growing produces straw, which is frequently burned, resulting in considerable atmospheric pollution and greenhouse gases. Previous research in the Mekong Delta has suggested that policymakers can incentivize rice farmers to transition from straw burning to sustainable straw management practices by creating an enabling environment to support farmers in achieving economies of scale through collective governance of straw management and mechanization of straw collecting and processing. However, little is known about the drivers of rice straw burning in the Mekong Delta. To address this gap, we surveyed 543 rice farmers in four provinces in the Mekong Delta in Vietnam. Multinomial logistic regression was used to examine the determinants of the adoption of alternative straw management practices. The survey results indicate that straw burning is practiced by 45–84 % of rice farmers, depending on the season. The results from the model reveal that straw burning peaks in the Winter-Spring cropping season in An Giang province and is more likely to be practiced by larger or contract farms, while sustainable straw management practices are more frequently adopted by wealthier households or farms that receive agricultural extension services. These findings confirm the importance of agricultural extension programs in achieving economies of scale in sustainable straw management. Policymakers can leverage and scale the adoption of sustainable straw management through public extension programs and by encouraging companies to govern and support these practices through private extension in their production contracts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Challenges
Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2025.101150
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Vietnamese History and Culture Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What drives rice farmers away from straw burning? Evidence from the Mekong Delta, Vietnam

Dinah Pura T. Depositario, Matty Demont, Isabelita M. Pabuayon, Ong Quoc Cuong
3 citations
Environmental Challenges
Vietnamese History and Culture Studies
12.60
article

What drives rice farmers away from straw burning? Evidence from the Mekong Delta, Vietnam

Dinah Pura T. Depositario, Matty Demont, Isabelita M. Pabuayon, Ong Quoc Cuong
article en
3 citations

Abstract

• Straw burning is practiced by 45–84 % of rice farmers, depending on the season. • Straw burning peaks in the Winter-Spring season in An Giang province. • Larger or contract farms are more likely to practice rice straw burning. • Sustainable rice straw management is associated with income and agricultural extension. • Policymakers can leverage sustainable straw management through contracting companies. The Asian mega deltas are critical for food security since they are among the most productive regions for rice cultivation globally. However, this comes at the expense of their environment. Rice growing produces straw, which is frequently burned, resulting in considerable atmospheric pollution and greenhouse gases. Previous research in the Mekong Delta has suggested that policymakers can incentivize rice farmers to transition from straw burning to sustainable straw management practices by creating an enabling environment to support farmers in achieving economies of scale through collective governance of straw management and mechanization of straw collecting and processing. However, little is known about the drivers of rice straw burning in the Mekong Delta. To address this gap, we surveyed 543 rice farmers in four provinces in the Mekong Delta in Vietnam. Multinomial logistic regression was used to examine the determinants of the adoption of alternative straw management practices. The survey results indicate that straw burning is practiced by 45–84 % of rice farmers, depending on the season. The results from the model reveal that straw burning peaks in the Winter-Spring cropping season in An Giang province and is more likely to be practiced by larger or contract farms, while sustainable straw management practices are more frequently adopted by wealthier households or farms that receive agricultural extension services. These findings confirm the importance of agricultural extension programs in achieving economies of scale in sustainable straw management. Policymakers can leverage and scale the adoption of sustainable straw management through public extension programs and by encouraging companies to govern and support these practices through private extension in their production contracts.

Environmental ChallengesVol. 19
University of the Philippines Los Baños (PH), International Rice Research Institute (PH), Can Tho University (VN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Vietnamese History and Culture Studies
12.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.