Too Much or Too Little? The Inverted U-shaped Relationship between Corporate Shadow Banking Activities and Green Production Efficiency

Under the theme of financial support for the real economy, we suggest that corporate shadow banking activities should enhance highquality economic development. Using a sample of nonfinancial listed companies from 2010 to 2021, we empirically test the inverted Ushaped relationship between corporate shadow banking and green production efficiency. The results show that moderate participation in shadow banking improves green production efficiency, while excessive participation hinders it. This relationship remains robust through instrumental variable methods, propensity score matching, and other tests. Mechanism analysis reveals that shadow banking activities impacts green production efficiency through economic and environmental benefits. Heterogeneity analysis finds that green institutional investors, high regional capital intensity, and command-and-control environmental policies mitigate the negative effects of shadow banking, while in non-state-owned enterprises, small firms, and those facing high financing constraints, the inverted U-shaped relationship remains. Additionally, threshold effects indicate that moderate financial supervision and environmental regulation maximize shadow banking’s positive impact on green production efficiency. Our findings provide guidance for aligning financial services with real economic needs and promoting sustainable economic growth.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Emerging Markets Finance and Trade
Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496x.2025.2460663
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Corporate Finance and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Too Much or Too Little? The Inverted U-shaped Relationship between Corporate Shadow Banking Activities and Green Production Efficiency

Qiuyun Zhao, Yingkai Yin, Sijing Li, J. G. Liou
1 citations
Emerging Markets Finance and Trade
Corporate Finance and Governance
3.91
article

Too Much or Too Little? The Inverted U-shaped Relationship between Corporate Shadow Banking Activities and Green Production Efficiency

Qiuyun Zhao, Yingkai Yin, Sijing Li, J. G. Liou
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Under the theme of financial support for the real economy, we suggest that corporate shadow banking activities should enhance highquality economic development. Using a sample of nonfinancial listed companies from 2010 to 2021, we empirically test the inverted Ushaped relationship between corporate shadow banking and green production efficiency. The results show that moderate participation in shadow banking improves green production efficiency, while excessive participation hinders it. This relationship remains robust through instrumental variable methods, propensity score matching, and other tests. Mechanism analysis reveals that shadow banking activities impacts green production efficiency through economic and environmental benefits. Heterogeneity analysis finds that green institutional investors, high regional capital intensity, and command-and-control environmental policies mitigate the negative effects of shadow banking, while in non-state-owned enterprises, small firms, and those facing high financing constraints, the inverted U-shaped relationship remains. Additionally, threshold effects indicate that moderate financial supervision and environmental regulation maximize shadow banking’s positive impact on green production efficiency. Our findings provide guidance for aligning financial services with real economic needs and promoting sustainable economic growth.

Emerging Markets Finance and TradeVol. 61(10)
Shanghai University (CN), Beijing Normal-Hong Kong Baptist University (CN), Hong Kong Baptist University (HK), Peking University (CN), Beijing Normal University (CN)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Corporate Finance and Governance
3.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.