How Greedy People Respond to Missing Discounts: Insatiability and Inaction Inertia

Greed is the insatiable desire for more. In three preregistered high-powered experiments, we examined the role of dispositional greed in inaction inertia, the phenomenon that people less likely act on a discount after missing a more attractive one. In Study 1 with a within-subjects design, we found strong evidence that higher greed weakens inaction inertia such that greedy people always want more and are less influenced by missed discounts. Studies 2 and 3 failed to replicate this moderation, both in between- and within-subjects designs. An integrative data analysis suggests that the relationship between greed and inaction inertia is more complex, with non-linearity and facet-specific effects. Overall, our results indicate that people dispositionally differ in how missed discounts influence future purchase decisions as a function of greed, but that these differences are more intricate than what current theorizing on greed predicts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Collabra Psychology
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.133273
Primary Topic
Economic Theory and Institutions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Greedy People Respond to Missing Discounts: Insatiability and Inaction Inertia

Marcel Zeelenberg, Moritz Ingendahl, Vanessa Rettkowski
Collabra Psychology
Economic Theory and Institutions
article

How Greedy People Respond to Missing Discounts: Insatiability and Inaction Inertia

Marcel Zeelenberg, Moritz Ingendahl, Vanessa Rettkowski
article en

Abstract

Greed is the insatiable desire for more. In three preregistered high-powered experiments, we examined the role of dispositional greed in inaction inertia, the phenomenon that people less likely act on a discount after missing a more attractive one. In Study 1 with a within-subjects design, we found strong evidence that higher greed weakens inaction inertia such that greedy people always want more and are less influenced by missed discounts. Studies 2 and 3 failed to replicate this moderation, both in between- and within-subjects designs. An integrative data analysis suggests that the relationship between greed and inaction inertia is more complex, with non-linearity and facet-specific effects. Overall, our results indicate that people dispositionally differ in how missed discounts influence future purchase decisions as a function of greed, but that these differences are more intricate than what current theorizing on greed predicts.

Collabra PsychologyVol. 11(1)
University of Mannheim (DE), Tilburg University (NL), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Universität Mannheim
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Economic Theory and Institutions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How Greedy People Respond to Missing Discounts: Insatiability and Inaction Inertia — Marcel Zeelenberg, Moritz Ingendahl, et al. · Collabra Psychology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS