Telemedicine option for concussion care does not impair treatment options (P4-12.008)

The primary purpose of the study is to examine the effect of video visit care (telehealth) on concussion clinical outcomes. We hypothesize that telehealth clinical care is not inferior to in-person care.

Authors

Nick Mannix
Andrew Sas
Kevin Weber (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8405-828X)
Joseph D. Finn

Institutions

The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (US)

Publication Details

Journal: Neurology
Published: 2025-04-07
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000212649
Primary Topic: Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Type: article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact: 0.00

Controls

|||

ALL TIME

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

article

Telemedicine option for concussion care does not impair treatment options (P4-12.008)

Nick Mannix, Andrew Sas, Kevin Weber, Joseph D. Finn

Apr 7, 2025

Neurology

Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

article

Telemedicine option for concussion care does not impair treatment options (P4-12.008)

Nick Mannix, Andrew Sas, Kevin Weber, Joseph D. Finn

April 7, 2025article en

Abstract

NeurologyVol. 104(7_Supplement_1)

The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (US)

Openalex Percentile: Top 90%

Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

DOI Source OpenAlex

AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Telemedicine option for concussion care does not impair treatment options (P4-12.008) — Nick Mannix, Andrew Sas, et al. · Neurology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS