Validation of an instrument to assess Barriers and Facilitators of Collaborative Interprofessional Practice

ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to develop and validate an instrument entitled Barriers and Facilitators of Collaborative Interprofessional Practice in Primary Health Care (BFCIP-PHC), which was developed in three stages. The first stage involved the development of the initial version of the instrument, which contained 12 items and was evaluated by 20 experts, who indicated that the questions were adequate in terms of content (lower bound 85%, higher bound 95%). The reproducibility of this approach was subsequently verified by reference to 27 health professionals. All the items exhibited a relative agreement greater than 74%. Finally, the content validity and internal consistency were assessed by reference to 799 Primary Health Care professionals. The results revealed a tri-factorial structure (Factor 1 – Team composition and opportunities for knowledge sharing; Factor 2 – Working conditions; and Factor 3 – Knowledge, attitudes and skills). The Cronbach’s alpha coefficients ranged between 0.76 and 0.87. The final model exhibited excellent goodness of fit and good values with respect to convergent and discriminant validity. The BFCIP-PHC was thus associated with good indicators of validity and may be recommended as a tool that can be used to evaluate the barriers and facilitators of collaborative interprofessional practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Saúde em Debate
Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/2358-289820251459602i
Primary Topic
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of an instrument to assess Barriers and Facilitators of Collaborative Interprofessional Practice

Brí­gida Gimenez Carvalho, Silvano da Silva Coutinho, Mathias Roberto Loch, Lucélia Justino Borges et al.
Saúde em Debate
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
article

Validation of an instrument to assess Barriers and Facilitators of Collaborative Interprofessional Practice

Brí­gida Gimenez Carvalho, Silvano da Silva Coutinho, Mathias Roberto Loch, Lucélia Justino Borges, Cassiano Ricardo Rech
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to develop and validate an instrument entitled Barriers and Facilitators of Collaborative Interprofessional Practice in Primary Health Care (BFCIP-PHC), which was developed in three stages. The first stage involved the development of the initial version of the instrument, which contained 12 items and was evaluated by 20 experts, who indicated that the questions were adequate in terms of content (lower bound 85%, higher bound 95%). The reproducibility of this approach was subsequently verified by reference to 27 health professionals. All the items exhibited a relative agreement greater than 74%. Finally, the content validity and internal consistency were assessed by reference to 799 Primary Health Care professionals. The results revealed a tri-factorial structure (Factor 1 – Team composition and opportunities for knowledge sharing; Factor 2 – Working conditions; and Factor 3 – Knowledge, attitudes and skills). The Cronbach’s alpha coefficients ranged between 0.76 and 0.87. The final model exhibited excellent goodness of fit and good values with respect to convergent and discriminant validity. The BFCIP-PHC was thus associated with good indicators of validity and may be recommended as a tool that can be used to evaluate the barriers and facilitators of collaborative interprofessional practice.

Saúde em DebateVol. 49(145)
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (BR), Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (BR), Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste (BR), Universidade Federal do Paraná (BR)
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Fundação Araucária
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.