Tensions regarding inclusion meanings from stakeholders’ perspectives: A qualitative study

In literature, a divergence is apparent concerning the definition of educational inclusion. The study aims to describe the relationship between the diversity of actors in the university community and their perception of institutional inclusion in higher education organizations in Chile. We employed a qualitative methodology based on Grounded Theory, conducting focus groups with 16 students, 17 teachers, five non-teaching staff, and eight authorities. We conducted a semi-structured interview with an authority, encompassing all three university campuses in the country. The data analysis revealed five subcategories associated with the topic. What is understood by the concept of inclusion? What do they think about inclusion? Who should be the subjects of inclusion? What changes have been observed in inclusion? Moreover, why is it necessary to define inclusion? The emphasis is on the diverse existing views around the approach to the concept and the need to generate definitions with institutional relevance to advance its development and implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0321375
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Inclusive Education and Diversity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tensions regarding inclusion meanings from stakeholders’ perspectives: A qualitative study

Cristóbal Rodrigo Sepúlveda Carrasco, Cristhian Pérez Villalobos, E. Reinoso-González, María José Solis-Grant et al.
1 citations
PLoS ONE
Inclusive Education and Diversity
8.93
article

Tensions regarding inclusion meanings from stakeholders’ perspectives: A qualitative study

Cristóbal Rodrigo Sepúlveda Carrasco, Cristhian Pérez Villalobos, E. Reinoso-González, María José Solis-Grant, María-José Bretti-López, Tatiana Sepúlveda-Witt, Juan Francisco Hernández-Quidel
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In literature, a divergence is apparent concerning the definition of educational inclusion. The study aims to describe the relationship between the diversity of actors in the university community and their perception of institutional inclusion in higher education organizations in Chile. We employed a qualitative methodology based on Grounded Theory, conducting focus groups with 16 students, 17 teachers, five non-teaching staff, and eight authorities. We conducted a semi-structured interview with an authority, encompassing all three university campuses in the country. The data analysis revealed five subcategories associated with the topic. What is understood by the concept of inclusion? What do they think about inclusion? Who should be the subjects of inclusion? What changes have been observed in inclusion? Moreover, why is it necessary to define inclusion? The emphasis is on the diverse existing views around the approach to the concept and the need to generate definitions with institutional relevance to advance its development and implementation.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(4)
University of Concepción (CL), Universidad de Los Andes, Chile (CL), Clínica Las Condes (CL), Universidad Andrés Bello (CL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Inclusive Education and Diversity
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.