Validation of body composition parameters extracted via deep learning-based segmentation from routine computed tomographies

Sarcopenia and body composition metrics are strongly associated with patient outcomes. In this study, we developed and validated a flexible, open-access pipeline integrating available deep learning-based segmentation models with pre- and postprocessing steps to extract body composition measures from routine computed tomography (CT) scans. In 337 surgical oncology patients, total skeletal muscle tissue (SM<sub>total</sub>), psoas muscle tissue (SM<sub>psoas</sub>), visceral adipose tissue (VAT), and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) were quantified both manually and using the pipeline. Automated and manual measurements showed strong correlations (SM<sub>psoas</sub>: r = 0.776, VAT: r = 0.993, SAT: r = 0.984; all P < 0.001). Measurement discrepancies primarily resulted from segmentation errors, anatomical anomalies or image irregularities. SM<sub>psoas</sub> measurements showed substantial variability depending on slice selection, whereas SM<sub>total</sub>, averaged across all L3 levels, provided greater measurement stability. Overall, SM<sub>total</sub> performed comparably to SM<sub>psoas</sub> in predicting overall survival (OS). In summary, body composition measures derived from the pipeline strongly correlated with manual measurements and were prognostic for OS. The increased stability of SM<sub>total</sub> across vertebral levels suggests it may serve as a more reliable alternative to psoas-based assessments. Future studies should address the identified areas of improvement to enhance the accuracy of automated segmentation models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-96238-6
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Nutrition and Health in Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.99

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of body composition parameters extracted via deep learning-based segmentation from routine computed tomographies

Jens Werner, Tengis Tschaidse, Stefanie Jarmusch, Tobias S. Schiergens et al.
6 citations
Scientific Reports
Nutrition and Health in Aging
6.99
article

Validation of body composition parameters extracted via deep learning-based segmentation from routine computed tomographies

Jens Werner, Tengis Tschaidse, Stefanie Jarmusch, Tobias S. Schiergens, Hanno Nieß, Bernhard Willibald Renz, Matthias Ilmer, Ughur Aghamaliyev, Christian Heiliger, Felix O. Hofmann, Alena B. Baumann, Liv A Auhage
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Sarcopenia and body composition metrics are strongly associated with patient outcomes. In this study, we developed and validated a flexible, open-access pipeline integrating available deep learning-based segmentation models with pre- and postprocessing steps to extract body composition measures from routine computed tomography (CT) scans. In 337 surgical oncology patients, total skeletal muscle tissue (SM<sub>total</sub>), psoas muscle tissue (SM<sub>psoas</sub>), visceral adipose tissue (VAT), and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) were quantified both manually and using the pipeline. Automated and manual measurements showed strong correlations (SM<sub>psoas</sub>: r = 0.776, VAT: r = 0.993, SAT: r = 0.984; all P < 0.001). Measurement discrepancies primarily resulted from segmentation errors, anatomical anomalies or image irregularities. SM<sub>psoas</sub> measurements showed substantial variability depending on slice selection, whereas SM<sub>total</sub>, averaged across all L3 levels, provided greater measurement stability. Overall, SM<sub>total</sub> performed comparably to SM<sub>psoas</sub> in predicting overall survival (OS). In summary, body composition measures derived from the pipeline strongly correlated with manual measurements and were prognostic for OS. The increased stability of SM<sub>total</sub> across vertebral levels suggests it may serve as a more reliable alternative to psoas-based assessments. Future studies should address the identified areas of improvement to enhance the accuracy of automated segmentation models.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
German Cancer Research Center (DE), Heidelberg University (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Deutschen Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Nutrition and Health in Aging
6.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.