Performance of Concrete-Filled Steel Tubular Columns with Bi-angled Structural Steel Encasement under Axial Compression—Technical Note

ABSTRACT This study investigates the axial compressive strength of steel-encased concrete-filled steel tubular (CFST) columns with the same cross-sectional area but with encasement oriented differently. A series of 6 different CFST columns of 12 specimens have been tested under axial compression, as per the guidelines in ANSI/AISC 360-16, Specification for Structural Steel Buildings. The E250 grade steel was used for the outer tube (70 by 70 by 1.6 mm) and inner angle section (ISA 25 by 25 by 3 mm). For the confinement of concrete, C40 grade was used. According to the experimental results, the influence of the bi-angled section significantly provides greater compressive strength for the cruciform-angled (double angle) CFST 01 and back-back attached (double angle) CFST 04 forms. The maximum theoretical strength composite column was derived as per the ANSI code and correlated with the experimental data. The load versus axial shortening curves were compared and commented on with differently oriented steel-encased columns. The CFST column failure pattern regarding ductility index and stiffness index has been investigated. Furthermore, the recommendation regarding the position and orientation of steel encasement has been made for bi-angled columns.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Testing and Evaluation
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1520/jte20240322
Primary Topic
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance of Concrete-Filled Steel Tubular Columns with Bi-angled Structural Steel Encasement under Axial Compression—Technical Note

Journal of Testing and Evaluation
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
article

Performance of Concrete-Filled Steel Tubular Columns with Bi-angled Structural Steel Encasement under Axial Compression—Technical Note

article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study investigates the axial compressive strength of steel-encased concrete-filled steel tubular (CFST) columns with the same cross-sectional area but with encasement oriented differently. A series of 6 different CFST columns of 12 specimens have been tested under axial compression, as per the guidelines in ANSI/AISC 360-16, Specification for Structural Steel Buildings. The E250 grade steel was used for the outer tube (70 by 70 by 1.6 mm) and inner angle section (ISA 25 by 25 by 3 mm). For the confinement of concrete, C40 grade was used. According to the experimental results, the influence of the bi-angled section significantly provides greater compressive strength for the cruciform-angled (double angle) CFST 01 and back-back attached (double angle) CFST 04 forms. The maximum theoretical strength composite column was derived as per the ANSI code and correlated with the experimental data. The load versus axial shortening curves were compared and commented on with differently oriented steel-encased columns. The CFST column failure pattern regarding ductility index and stiffness index has been investigated. Furthermore, the recommendation regarding the position and orientation of steel encasement has been made for bi-angled columns.

Journal of Testing and EvaluationVol. 53(3)
SASTRA University (IN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Performance of Concrete-Filled Steel Tubular Columns with Bi-angled Structural Steel Encasement under Axial Compression—Technical Note · Journal of Testing and Evaluation (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS