Benchmarking Anomaly Detection Methods for Extracardiac Findings in Cardiac MRI

In cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, an initial set of sequences is acquired to guide the definition of the subsequent cardiac views. These sequences provide a large field of view, enabling the detection of extracardiac findings (ECFs). Although ECFs may have significant clinical relevance, they are typically overlooked since they fall outside the scope of cardiac examinations. The only prior attempt to automatically detect incidental ECFs employed fully supervised methods but faced substantial limitations due to the impracticality of collecting comprehensive samples given the wide range of possible anomalies across various organs. This study investigates the potential of recent anomaly detection (AD) methods to address this challenge. While AD methods have gained popularity, their application has been largely confined to industrial settings or medical imaging tasks such as brain MR or chest X-ray, which exhibit lower anatomical variability and complexity than cardiac MR anatomical sequences. Hereto, twenty state-of-the-art (SOTA) AD methods, including unsupervised, semi-supervised, and open-set supervised learning methodologies, are compared against two fully supervised baselines for detecting ECFs in anatomical planes of cardiac MR. Results from our in-house dataset reveal suboptimal performance of SOTA AD methods, highlighting the need for further research in this domain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15074027
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Benchmarking Anomaly Detection Methods for Extracardiac Findings in Cardiac MRI

Patricia Costa, Jaime C. Fonseca, Victória Pereira, Sandro Queirós et al.
1 citations
Applied Sciences
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
2.48
article

Benchmarking Anomaly Detection Methods for Extracardiac Findings in Cardiac MRI

Patricia Costa, Jaime C. Fonseca, Victória Pereira, Sandro Queirós, Catarina Silva, Edgar Pinto
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, an initial set of sequences is acquired to guide the definition of the subsequent cardiac views. These sequences provide a large field of view, enabling the detection of extracardiac findings (ECFs). Although ECFs may have significant clinical relevance, they are typically overlooked since they fall outside the scope of cardiac examinations. The only prior attempt to automatically detect incidental ECFs employed fully supervised methods but faced substantial limitations due to the impracticality of collecting comprehensive samples given the wide range of possible anomalies across various organs. This study investigates the potential of recent anomaly detection (AD) methods to address this challenge. While AD methods have gained popularity, their application has been largely confined to industrial settings or medical imaging tasks such as brain MR or chest X-ray, which exhibit lower anatomical variability and complexity than cardiac MR anatomical sequences. Hereto, twenty state-of-the-art (SOTA) AD methods, including unsupervised, semi-supervised, and open-set supervised learning methodologies, are compared against two fully supervised baselines for detecting ECFs in anatomical planes of cardiac MR. Results from our in-house dataset reveal suboptimal performance of SOTA AD methods, highlighting the need for further research in this domain.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(7)
Centro Hospitalar Tondela-Viseu (PT), Administração Regional de Saúde de Lisboa e Vale do Tejo (PT), Unidade Hospitalar de Bragança (PT), University of Minho (PT)
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.